Literature DB >> 21694129

Joint structure refinement of x-ray and neutron diffraction data on disordered materials: application to liquid water.

A K Soper1.   

Abstract

X-ray diffraction data on liquids and disordered solids often provide useful complementary structural information to neutron diffraction data. Interpretation of the x-ray diffraction pattern, which is produced by scattering from the atomic electrons rather than from the atomic nuclei as in the case of neutron diffraction, is, however, complicated by the Q-dependent electronic form factors, which cause the x-ray diffraction signal to decline rapidly with increasing Q, where Q is the wave vector change in the diffraction experiment. The problem is particularly important in cases such as water where there is a significant molecular polarization caused by charge transfer within the molecule. This means that the electron form factors applicable to the molecule in the condensed environment often deviate from their free atom values. The technique of empirical potential structure refinement (EPSR) is used here to focus on the problem of forming a single atomistic structural model which is simultaneously consistent with both x-ray and neutron diffraction data. The case of liquid water is treated explicitly. It is found that x-ray data for water do indeed provide a powerful constraint on possible structural models, but that the Q-range of the different x-ray data sets (maximum Q ranges from 10.8 to ∼17.0 Å(-1) for different x-ray experiments), combined with variations between different data sets, means that it is not possible to rigorously define the precise position and height of the first peak in the OO radial distribution function. Equally, it is found that two different neutron datasets on water, although measured to a maximum Q of at least 30 Å(-1), give rise to further small uncertainties in the position of the hydrogen bond peaks. One general conclusion from the combined use of neutron and x-ray data is that many of the classical water potentials may have a core which is too repulsive at short distances. This produces too sharp a peak in r-space at too short a distance. A softer core potential is proposed here.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21694129     DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/33/335206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter        ISSN: 0953-8984            Impact factor:   2.333


  18 in total

1.  Structure of the floating water bridge and water in an electric field.

Authors:  Lawrie B Skinner; Chris J Benmore; Badri Shyam; J K R Weber; John B Parise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Properties of water along the liquid-vapor coexistence curve via molecular dynamics simulations using the polarizable TIP4P-QDP-LJ water model.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Microscopic structure of water at elevated pressures and temperatures.

Authors:  Christoph J Sahle; Christian Sternemann; Christian Schmidt; Susi Lehtola; Sandro Jahn; Laura Simonelli; Simo Huotari; Mikko Hakala; Tuomas Pylkkänen; Alexander Nyrow; Kolja Mende; Metin Tolan; Keijo Hämäläinen; Max Wilke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Liquid water is a dynamic polydisperse branched polymer.

Authors:  Saber Naserifar; William A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reply to Head-Gordon and Paesani: Liquid water, a branched polymer with ∼100-fs short-lived heterogeneous hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Saber Naserifar; William A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Why Proteins are Big: Length Scale Effects on Equilibria and Kinetics.

Authors:  Kenneth A Rubinson
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.371

7.  Direct comparisons of experimental and calculated neutron structure factors of pure solvents as a method for force field validation.

Authors:  Jennie L Thomas; Douglas J Tobias; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Water-peptide site-specific interactions: a structural study on the hydration of glutathione.

Authors:  Ernesto Scoppola; Armida Sodo; Sylvia E McLain; Maria Antonietta Ricci; Fabio Bruni
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Systematic improvement of a classical molecular model of water.

Authors:  Lee-Ping Wang; Teresa Head-Gordon; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren; John D Chodera; Peter K Eastman; Todd J Martinez; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Incorporating Phase-Dependent Polarizability in Non-Additive Electrostatic Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Aqueous Liquid-Vapor Interface.

Authors:  Brad A Bauer; G Lee Warren; Sandeep Patel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.