Literature DB >> 17958354

Direct comparisons of experimental and calculated neutron structure factors of pure solvents as a method for force field validation.

Jennie L Thomas1, Douglas J Tobias, Alexander D Mackerell.   

Abstract

In the present letter, we directly compare neutron structure factors calculated from force field (FF)-based molecular dynamics simulations with experimental structure factors for water, methanol, and tetrahydrofuran (THF). For water, the difference in the measured structure factors is more significant than differences between the FFs. It is shown that the inclusion of electronic polarization in the force field improves the agreement with experiment for the more-polar methanol, whereas the results are comparable for the additive and polarizable FF models of the less-polar THF. The data presented here confirm that comparing the calculated scattering profiles from FF-based MD simulations to measured neutron structure factors is a promising method for FF validation and development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17958354      PMCID: PMC2568990          DOI: 10.1021/jp076501p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  5 in total

1.  Neutron diffraction and computer simulation studies of D-xylose.

Authors:  Philip E Mason; George W Neilson; John E Enderby; Marie-Louise Saboungi; John W Brady
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  The structure of liquid tetrahydrofuran.

Authors:  Daniel T Bowron; John L Finney; Alan K Soper
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Joint structure refinement of x-ray and neutron diffraction data on disordered materials: application to liquid water.

Authors:  A K Soper
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.333

4.  Microstructure of neat alcohols: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Larisa Zoranić; Franjo Sokolić; Aurélien Perera
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins.

Authors:  A D MacKerell; D Bashford; M Bellott; R L Dunbrack; J D Evanseck; M J Field; S Fischer; J Gao; H Guo; S Ha; D Joseph-McCarthy; L Kuchnir; K Kuczera; F T Lau; C Mattos; S Michnick; T Ngo; D T Nguyen; B Prodhom; W E Reiher; B Roux; M Schlenkrich; J C Smith; R Stote; J Straub; M Watanabe; J Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera; D Yin; M Karplus
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.991

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields.

Authors:  Dmitry Bedrov; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Oleg Borodin; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoît Roux; Christian Schröder
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Limiting assumptions in molecular modeling: electrostatics.

Authors:  Garland R Marshall
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.