Literature DB >> 21693345

Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.

F Alan Barber1, Morley A Herbert, Onur Hapa, Jay H Rapley, Cameron A K Barber, James A Bynum, Scott A Hrnack.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical and design characteristics of newer suture anchors.
METHODS: Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs by use of an established protocol. A mechanical testing machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at 12.5 mm/s until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure was recorded. Rotator cuff anchors tested included the Doubleplay and Opus SpeedScrew (ArthroCare Sports Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA); PEEK Intraline and PEEK Zip (Stryker, San Jose, CA); Paladin, SuperRevo FT, and CrossFT (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); Piton (Tornier, Warsaw, IN); Ti Screw, ALLthread PEEK, LactoScrew, ALLthread Ti, and ALLthread PEEK knotless (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN). Glenoid anchors included the Gryphon BR P (DePuy-Mitek, Raynham, MA) and JuggerKnot 1.4 (Biomet Sports Medicine).
RESULTS: Mean cortical failure loads for cuff anchors were as follows: Doubleplay 5.0, 279 N; Doubleplay 6.5, 338 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.5, 336 N; PEEK Intraline 5.5, 263 N; PEEK Intraline 6.5, 344 N; PEEK Zip 5.5, 435 N; PEEK Zip 6.5, 502 N; Paladin 5.0, 500 N; Paladin 6.5, 521 N; SuperRevo FT, 496 N; CrossFT, 569 N; Piton, 379 N; Ti Screw 5.0, 457 N; Ti Screw 6.5, 443 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.5, 476 N; LactoScrew 5.5, 403 N; ALLthread Ti 5.0, 526 N; ALLthread Ti 6.5, 653 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 441 N). Mean cortical failure loads for glenoid anchors were 161 N for Gryphon BR P and 239 N for JuggerKnot 1.4. Mean cancellous bone failure loads for cuff anchors were Doubleplay 5.0, 263 N; Doubleplay 6.5, 340 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.5, 344 N; PEEK Intraline 5.5, 274 N; PEEK Intraline 6.5, 327 N; PEEK Zip 5.5, 401 N; PEEK Zip 6.5, 396 N; Paladin 5.0, 427 N; Paladin 6.5, 491 N; SuperRevo FT, 483 N; CrossFT, 547 N; Piton, 365 N; Ti Screw 5.0, 420 N; Ti Screw 6.5, 448 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.5, 475 N; LactoScrew 5.5, 435 N; ALLthread Ti 5.0, 512 N; ALLthread Ti 6.5, 612 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 466 N). Mean cancellous failure loads for glenoid anchors were 117 N for Gryphon BR P and 194 N for JuggerKnot 1.4. None of the anchors had pullout as the predominant failure mode. Eyelet failure was the predominant failure mode for Doubleplay, Opus SpeedScrew, PEEK Intraline, Gryphon BR P, ALLthread Ti 6.5, ALLthread PEEK 5.5, and LactoScrew.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure load was not dependent on anchor location (cancellous or cortical bone) (P = .58) but was dependent on anchor type (cuff anchor or glenoid anchor) (P < .001). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Whereas larger fully threaded screw anchors designed for rotator cuff repair showed higher failure strengths than smaller non-screw anchors designed for glenoid repairs (P < .05), the larger version of a screw anchor for a cuff repair did not provide a statistically greater failure load than the smaller screw anchor.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21693345     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  21 in total

1.  Early anchor displacement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Gábor Skaliczki; Paolo Paladini; Giovanni Merolla; Fabrizio Campi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Maximum load to failure and tensile displacement of an all-suture glenoid anchor compared with a screw-in glenoid anchor.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Thomas L Willett; Andrew P Dold; Massimo Petrera; David Wasserstein; Danny B Whelan; John S Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio-absorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding osseous reaction.

Authors:  Hendrik Haneveld; Konstantin Hug; Gerd Diederichs; Markus Scheibel; Christian Gerhardt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A novel suture anchor constructed of cortical bone for rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study on sheep humerus specimens.

Authors:  Qi Guo; Chunbao Li; Wei Qi; Hongliang Li; Xi Lu; Xuezhen Shen; Feng Qu; Yujie Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Arthroscopic Repair of Ankle Instability With All-Soft Knotless Anchors.

Authors:  Hélder Pereira; Gwen Vuurberg; Nuno Gomes; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira; Pedro L Ripoll; Rui Luís Reis; João Espregueira-Mendes; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Pullout strength of all suture anchors in the repair of rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Alexandre Galland; Stéphane Airaudi; Renaud Gravier; Sophie Le Cann; Patrick Chabrand; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A criterion based sling weaning progression (sweap) and outcomes following shoulder arthroscopic surgery in an active duty military population.

Authors:  Justin M Hire; Joshua E Pniewski; Michelle L Dickston; Jeremy M Jacobs; Terry L Mueller; Brian E Abell; John A Bojescul
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04

8.  History of rotator cuff surgery.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Davide Cucchi; Vincenza Ragone; Laura de Girolamo; Paolo Cabitza; Mario Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Arthroscopic lateral meniscus root repair with soft suture anchor technique.

Authors:  Niti Prasathaporn; Somsak Kuptniratsaikul; Kitiphong Kongrukgreatiyos
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-11-15

10.  Prospective multicentre study of the clinical and functional outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair with suture anchors.

Authors:  F Mille; A Adam; S Aubry; G Leclerc; X Ghislandi; P Sergent; P Garbuio
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.