Literature DB >> 21691722

Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies.

Bjoern Grabski1, Leif Baeurle, Annemie Loch, Bjoern Wefer, Udo Paul, Tillmann Loch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve prostate cancer diagnostic imaging, a computer-based analysis of the transrectal ultrasound signal (C-TRUS) was developed. Until recently, the C-TRUS existed only as a stand-alone device. Now, C-TRUS was developed into a network-compatible module (C-TRUS-MS). This new technology allows users to transmit C-TRUS images from any internet platform to C-TRUS-MS investigation. After analysis, the cancer-suspicious marked images are then retransmitted via internet. Targeted biopsies can then be taken at the urologists' office remotely.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study investigates whether the rates of prostate cancer detection with C-TRUS-MS "multicenter online" are comparable with those achieved by the stand-alone unit. In addition to patients with a history of multiple systematic random biopsies, a group of patients who had not undergone systematic random biopsies were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 1,545 digital images (2-23 per patient, median 6) from 57 urologists were transmitted to the analysis center. After analysis, the color-coded images were sent back electronically and utilized for a maximum of six targeted biopsies. C-TRUS-MS was able to detect prostate cancer in 91 patients. In addition, we evaluated 75 patients without any previous random biopsies. In this group, C-TRUS-MS was able to detect prostate cancer in 31 out of 75 patients (41%).
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that C-TRUS-MS "online" achieves similar results as the stand-alone system, independent of the user even with little experience in the method. Furthermore, C-TRUS-MS for the first time is able to detect carcinomas in patients without prior biopsies in a high number by taking only six targeted biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691722     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0713-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  24 in total

1.  Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  T A Stamey; N Yang; A R Hay; J E McNeal; F S Freiha; E Redwine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  [Improvement of transrectal ultrasound. Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) in detection and staging of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  T Loch; I Leuschner; C Genberg; K Weichert-Jacobsen; F Küppers; M Retz; J Lehmann; E Yfantis; M Evans; V Tsarev; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  T Loch; I Leuschner; C Genberg; K Weichert-Jacobsen; F Küppers; E Yfantis; M Evans; V Tsarev; M Stöckle
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam).

Authors:  P M Beemsterboer; R Kranse; H J de Koning; J D Habbema; F H Schröder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Richard A Ashley; Brant A Inman; Jonathan C Routh; Lance A Mynderse; Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Neil Fleshner; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A L Potosky; B A Miller; P C Albertsen; B S Kramer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office.

Authors:  J Stephen Jones; Mehmet Oder; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Anatomic and Molecular Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eric T Miller; Amirali Salmasi; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  [Imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  J Walz; T Loch; G Salomon; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Sonographic imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  B Schlenker; D A Clevert; G Salomon
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies.

Authors:  Antoine van Hove; Pierre-Henri Savoie; Charlotte Maurin; Serge Brunelle; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Naji Salem; Jochen Walz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  A 12-year follow-up of ANNA/C-TRUS image-targeted biopsies in patients suspicious for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Udo Paul; Leif Bäurle; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Internal Fusion: exact correlation of transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate by detailed landmarks over time for targeted biopsies or follow-up.

Authors:  Yanqi Xie; Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karl Pummer; Malte Rieken; Herbert Augustin; Thomas Gutschi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Georg Schäfer; Eberhard Steiner; Werner Jaschke; Wolfgang Horninger; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Combination of C-TRUS with multiparametric MRI: potential for improving detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Strunk; G Decker; W Willinek; S C Mueller; S Rogenhofer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.