Literature DB >> 21683039

Economic analysis of methamphetamine prevention effects and employer costs.

Max Guyll1, Richard Spoth, D Max Crowley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to evaluate economically three interventions designed to prevent substance use in general populations of adolescents, specifically focusing on the prevention of methamphetamine use and its subsequent benefits to employers.
METHOD: In a randomized, controlled trial, three preventive interventions were delivered to 6th- or 7th-grade youth in 58 Iowa school districts, with 905 of these youth (449 girls) providing follow-up assessments as 12th graders. Intervention conditions included the family-focused Iowa Strengthening Families Program (ISFP), the school-based Life Skills Training (LST) program, and a combined condition of both the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (SFP10- 14; an ISFP revision) plus LST (LST + SFP10-14). Analyses based on intervention costs, 12th-grade methamphetamine use rates, and methamphetamine- related employer costs yielded estimates of intervention cost, cost-effectiveness, benefit-cost ratio, and net benefit.
RESULTS: The ISFP lowered methamphetamine use by 3.9%, cost $25,385 to prevent each case, and had a benefit-cost ratio of 3.84, yielding a net benefit of $2,813 per youth. The LST program reduced methamphetamine use by 2.5%, required $5,122 per prevented case, and had a benefit-cost ratio of 19.04, netting $2,273 per youth. The combined LST + SFP10-14 prevention condition lowered methamphetamine use rates by 1.8%, cost $62,697 to prevent each case, had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.56, and netted $620 per youth. Findings were robust after varying a number of key parameters across a range of plausible values.
CONCLUSIONS: Substance use prevention programming is economically feasible, particularly for effective interventions that have lower per person treatment delivery costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683039      PMCID: PMC3125881          DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  14 in total

1.  A general model of the impact of absenteeism on employers and employees.

Authors:  Mark V Pauly; Sean Nicholson; Judy Xu; Dan Polsky; Patricia M Danzon; James F Murray; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Universal family-focused interventions in alcohol-use disorder prevention: cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of two interventions.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Max Guyll; Susan X Day
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2002-03

3.  Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Cleve Redmond; Linda Trudeau; Chungyeol Shin
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2002-06

4.  The willingness to pay for health changes, the human-capital approach and the external costs.

Authors:  M Johannesson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community health and well-being.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2005-06

6.  Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use among adolescents.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Scott Clair; Chungyeol Shin; Cleve Redmond
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2006-09

7.  Issues in the Economic Evaluation of Prevention Programs.

Authors:  E Michael Foster; Kenneth A Dodge; Damon Jones
Journal:  Appl Dev Sci       Date:  2003-04-01

8.  Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: extending a public health-oriented research base.

Authors:  R Spoth; C Redmond; C Shin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-04

9.  Cost-effectiveness of a school-based tobacco-use prevention program.

Authors:  L Y Wang; L S Crossett; R Lowry; S Sussman; C W Dent
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-09

10.  Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey.

Authors:  B F Grant; D A Dawson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse       Date:  1997
View more
  12 in total

1.  Associations of childhood experiences and methamphetamine use among Akha and Lahu hill tribe youths in northern Thailand: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tawatchai Apidechkul; Chalitar Chomchoei; Pilasinee Wongnuch; Ratipark Tamornpark; Panupong Upala; Fartima Yeemard; Marisa Poomiphak Na Nongkhai; Woottichai Nachaiwieng; Rachanee Sunsern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: the translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework.

Authors:  Richard Spoth; Louise A Rohrbach; Mark Greenberg; Philip Leaf; C Hendricks Brown; Abigail Fagan; Richard F Catalano; Mary Ann Pentz; Zili Sloboda; J David Hawkins
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-08

3.  Building Efficient Crime Prevention Strategies: Considering the Economics of Investing in Human Development.

Authors:  D Max Crowley
Journal:  Criminol Public Policy       Date:  2013-05

Review 4.  A Framework for Valuing Investments in a Nurturing Society: Opportunities for Prevention Research.

Authors:  Max Crowley; Damon Jones
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-03

5.  Economic analysis of a multi-site prevention program: assessment of program costs and characterizing site-level variability.

Authors:  Phaedra S Corso; Justin B Ingels; Steven M Kogan; E Michael Foster; Yi-Fu Chen; Gene H Brody
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2013-10

6.  Substance misuse prevention and economic analysis: challenges and opportunities regarding international utility.

Authors:  Max Guyll; Richard Spoth; Marilyn A Cornish
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2012 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Can we build an efficient response to the prescription drug abuse epidemic? Assessing the cost effectiveness of universal prevention in the PROSPER trial.

Authors:  D Max Crowley; Damon E Jones; Donna L Coffman; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  A Systematic Review of School-Based Alcohol and other Drug Prevention Programs.

Authors:  Roberta Agabio; Giuseppina Trincas; Francesca Floris; Gioia Mura; Federica Sancassiani; Matthias C Angermeyer
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 9.  Beyond effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Program (10-14): a scoping RE-AIM-based review.

Authors:  Nádia P Pinheiro-Carozzo; Sheila G Murta; Luís Gustavo do A Vinha; Isabela M da Silva; Anne Marie G V Fontaine
Journal:  Psicol Reflex Crit       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 10.  Translating family-focused prevention science into public health impact.

Authors:  Richard L Spoth; Lisa L Schainker; Susanne Hiller-Sturmhöefel
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.