Literature DB >> 21682423

Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants.

Andrew E Vandali1, Richard J M van Hoesel.   

Abstract

A sound-coding strategy for users of cochlear implants, named enhanced-envelope-encoded tone (eTone), was developed to improve coding of fundamental frequency (F0) in the temporal envelopes of the electrical stimulus signals. It is based on the advanced combinational encoder (ACE) strategy and includes additional processing that explicitly applies F0 modulation to channel envelope signals that contain harmonics of prominent complex tones. Channels that contain only inharmonic signals retain envelopes normally produced by ACE. The strategy incorporates an F0 estimator to determine the frequency of modulation and a harmonic probability estimator to control the amount of modulation enhancement applied to each channel. The F0 estimator was designed to provide an accurate estimate of F0 with minimal processing lag and robustness to the effects of competing noise. Error rates for the F0 estimator and accuracy of the harmonic probability estimator were compared with previous approaches and outcomes demonstrated that the strategy operates effectively across a range of signals and conditions that are relevant to cochlear implant users.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682423     DOI: 10.1121/1.3573988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xing Li; Kaibao Nie; Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein; Les E Atlas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 5.  The effectiveness of sound-processing strategies on tonal language cochlear implant users: A systematic review.

Authors:  Haihong Liu; Xiaoxia Peng; Yawen Zhao; Xin Ni
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2017-12-27

6.  Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Anneke Lenssen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-03

7.  The effect of enhancing temporal periodicity cues on Cantonese tone recognition by cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Tan Lee; Shing Yu; Meng Yuan; Terence Ka Cheong Wong; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

10.  Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.

Authors:  Vijay Marimuthu; Brett A Swanson; Robert Mannell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.