Literature DB >> 29599389

Dual Coding of Frequency Modulation in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.

Nihaad Paraouty1,2, Arkadiusz Stasiak1, Christian Lorenzi2, Léo Varnet2, Ian M Winter3.   

Abstract

Frequency modulation (FM) is a common acoustic feature of natural sounds and is known to play a role in robust sound source recognition. Auditory neurons show precise stimulus-synchronized discharge patterns that may be used for the representation of low-rate FM. However, it remains unclear whether this representation is based on synchronization to slow temporal envelope (ENV) cues resulting from cochlear filtering or phase locking to faster temporal fine structure (TFS) cues. To investigate the plausibility of those encoding schemes, single units of the ventral cochlear nucleus of guinea pigs of either sex were recorded in response to sine FM tones centered at the unit's best frequency (BF). The results show that, in contrast to high-BF units, for modulation depths within the receptive field, low-BF units (<4 kHz) demonstrate good phase locking to TFS. For modulation depths extending beyond the receptive field, the discharge patterns follow the ENV and fluctuate at the modulation rate. The receptive field proved to be a good predictor of the ENV responses for most primary-like and chopper units. The current in vivo data also reveal a high level of diversity in responses across unit types. TFS cues are mainly conveyed by low-frequency and primary-like units and ENV cues by chopper and onset units. The diversity of responses exhibited by cochlear nucleus neurons provides a neural basis for a dual-coding scheme of FM in the brainstem based on both ENV and TFS cues.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Natural sounds, including speech, convey informative temporal modulations in frequency. Understanding how the auditory system represents those frequency modulations (FM) has important implications as robust sound source recognition depends crucially on the reception of low-rate FM cues. Here, we recorded 115 single-unit responses from the ventral cochlear nucleus in response to FM and provide the first physiological evidence of a dual-coding mechanism of FM via synchronization to temporal envelope cues and phase locking to temporal fine structure cues. We also demonstrate a diversity of neural responses with different coding specializations. These results support the dual-coding scheme proposed by psychophysicists to account for FM sensitivity in humans and provide new insights on how this might be implemented in the early stages of the auditory pathway.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/384123-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear nucleus; envelope; frequency modulation; phase locking; temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29599389      PMCID: PMC6596033          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2107-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  105 in total

1.  Interaural time sensitivity dominated by cochlea-induced envelope patterns.

Authors:  Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  P X Joris; C E Schreiner; A Rees
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the inferior colliculus revealing selectivity for spectral motion in conspecific vocalizations.

Authors:  Sari Andoni; Na Li; George D Pollak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds.

Authors:  I Nelken; Y Rotman; O Bar Yosef
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Response of cat cochlear nucleus neurons to frequency and amplitude modulated tones.

Authors:  R D Fernald; G L Gerstein
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-10-27       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Excitation and inhibition in cochlear nucleus. II. Frequency-modulated tones.

Authors:  S D Erulkar; R A Butler; G L Gerstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Responses to linear and logarithmic frequency-modulated sweeps in ferret primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  I Nelken; H Versnel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Processing of sinusoidally frequency modulated signals in the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  R F Huffman; P C Argeles; E Covey
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition sharpens tuning for frequency modulations in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat.

Authors:  U Koch; B Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Discrimination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation for 2- and 10-Hz Rates.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Sashi Mariathasan; Aleksander P Sęk
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Robustness to Noise in the Auditory System: A Distributed and Predictable Property.

Authors:  S Souffi; C Lorenzi; C Huetz; J-M Edeline
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-03-18

4.  Bottom-up and top-down neural signatures of disordered multi-talker speech perception in adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor DeGruttola; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The role of cochlear place coding in the perception of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.