Literature DB >> 21680066

Identifying appearance-related concerns in routine follow-up clinics following treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

J Flexen1, N Ghazali, D Lowe, S N Rogers.   

Abstract

Facial disfigurement can be a consequence of treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Patients' concerns about appearance and the impact this has on quality of life are very important, but are often not recognised in a busy outpatient clinic. We aimed to assess concerns about appearance using the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire version 4 (UW-QoL) and the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI), a self-administered questionnaire that allows patients to choose what they would like to discuss in their consultation. Prospective data were collected from 204 patients who attended routine follow-up clinics from August 2007 to mid-July 2009. Fifty-seven percent were male, 68% had cancer of the oral cavity, 78% had clinical T1-T2 tumours, 19% had node positive tumours, 44% had had radiotherapy since diagnosis, and 48% had had free-flap reconstructive surgery. They all completed the questionnaires using touch-screen computer technology at 454 clinic appointments. Appearance was raised on the inventory at 9% (42/454) of clinics, and at 10% (47/454) it was indicated as a serious problem on the UW-QoL questionnaire. Concerns about appearance were raised on the inventory or were shown to be a serious problem on the UW-QoL in 14% (64/454) of patients. The main factors associated with those who reported concerns about appearance were age (younger patients), sex (female), T stage (III and IV), and site (oropharynx). Patients who choose concerns about appearance for discussion on the UW-QoL questionnaire and not on the PCI risk being missed if only the PCI is completed. Both tools compliment the screening of patients who have problems with facial disfigurement; failure to identify them can have serious clinical and psychosocial implications.
Copyright © 2011 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21680066     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  12 in total

1.  Treatment referral before and after the introduction of the Liverpool Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) into routine head and neck oncology outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Anastasios Kanatas; Daniel J R Langley; Barry Scott; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Issues patients would like to discuss at their review consultation: variation by early and late stage oral, oropharyngeal and laryngeal subsites.

Authors:  A Kanatas; N Ghazali; D Lowe; M Udberg; J Heseltine; E O'Mahony; S N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Characteristics and referral of head and neck cancer patients who report chewing and dental issues on the Patient Concerns Inventory.

Authors:  R Mahmood; C Butterworth; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Gender-specific differences concerning psychosocial aspects and functional impairments that influence quality of life in oral cancer treatment.

Authors:  Philipp Jehn; Sabine Swantje Linsen; Alexander-Nicolai Zeller; Fabian Matthias Eckstein; Michael-Tobias Neuhaus; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Gertrud Krüskemper; Fritjof Lentge; Simon Spalthoff; Philippe Korn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Identifying pain-related concerns in routine follow-up clinics following oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Alexander J Cleator; Derek Lowe; Naseem Ghazali
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-10

6.  Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: long-term quality of life and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Peter T Dziegielewski; Theodoros N Teknos; Kasim Durmus; Matthew Old; Amit Agrawal; Kiran Kakarala; Anna Marcinow; Enver Ozer
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  Enhanced patient reported outcome measurement suitable for head and neck cancer follow-up clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-06-13

8.  Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Primary Surgery for Oral Cancer: Preoperative and Postoperative Analysis

Authors:  Thales Salles Angelim Viana; Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva; Karuza Maria Alves Pereira; Mario Rogério Lima Mota; Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves; Eric Fernandes de Souza; Fabricio Bitu Sousa
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-08-27

9.  Determinants for further wishes for cosmetic and reconstructive interventions in 1652 patients with surgical treated carcinomas of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Henrik Holtmann; Simon Spalthoff; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Jörg Handschel; Julian Lommen; Norbert R Kübler; Gertrud Krüskemper; Majeed Rana; Karoline Sander
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

10.  The making of local hospital discharge arrangements: specifying the role of professional groups.

Authors:  Viola Burau; Flemming Bro
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.