Literature DB >> 21725827

Treatment referral before and after the introduction of the Liverpool Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) into routine head and neck oncology outpatient clinics.

Naseem Ghazali1, Anastasios Kanatas, Daniel J R Langley, Barry Scott, Derek Lowe, Simon N Rogers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Holistic needs assessment is a key recommendation in improving supportive and palliative care in adults with cancer. The Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) is a holistic needs assessment tool designed for head and neck cancer survivors in outpatient setting. Routine screening of potential unmet needs in a clinic may result in increased onward referrals, thus placing a burden on existing healthcare services. The aim of this study was to compare the referral trends following consultation in the time periods before and after introduction of PCI in an oncology outpatient clinic.
METHOD: A cross-sectional cohort of disease-free survivors of oral/oropharyngeal cancers of a single consultant was prospectively exposed to PCI from July 2007 to April 2009. The PCI is a self-completed questionnaire consisting of 55 items of patient needs/concern and a list of multidisciplinary professionals, whom patients may wish to talk to or be referred to. Retrospective analysis of referral patterns from clinic letters in two periods in the pre-PCI and post-PCI exposure was performed. Prospective analysis of consultations was performed to determine the outcome of PCI-highlighted items.
RESULTS: There was no change in the prevalence of onward referral with the introduction of PCI, i.e. 21 referrals per 100 patients seen in outpatients. However, the proportion of referrals to oral rehabilitation and psychological support increased. Referrals to certain services, e.g. speech and language and dentistry, remained consistently in demand. Many PCI-highlighted needs were dealt in a clinic with by the consultant and/or other professionals during a multidisciplinary consultation.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of PCI promotes target efficiency by directing and apportioning appropriate services to meet the needs for supportive care of head and neck cancer survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21725827     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1222-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  18 in total

1.  A feasibility study of computer-assisted health-related quality of life data collection in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  L Millsopp; S Frackleton; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer.

Authors:  Marrit A Tuinman; Stacey M Gazendam-Donofrio; Josette E Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Patient and carer unmet needs: a survey of the British association of head and neck oncology nurses.

Authors:  S N Rogers; N Clifford; D Lowe
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Fear of recurrence following head and neck cancer in the outpatient clinic.

Authors:  S N Rogers; B Scott; D Lowe; G Ozakinci; G M Humphris
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Psychologic response of the edentulous patient after primary surgery for oral cancer: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S N Rogers; D McNally; M Mahmoud; M F Chan; G M Humphris
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 6.  Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.

Authors:  Alison Richardson; Jibby Medina; Vivienne Brown; John Sitzia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Unmet information needs and preferences in newly diagnosed and surgically treated oral cavity cancer patients.

Authors:  Shu-Ching Chen; Yeur-Hur Lai; Chun-Ta Liao; Joseph Tung-Chien Chang; Chia-Chin Lin
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Multidisciplinary approaches in the management of advanced head and neck tumors: state of the art.

Authors:  Michael K Gibson; Arlene A Forastiere
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.645

9.  Acceptability of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List to community-based telephone cancer helpline operators, and to cancer patients and carers.

Authors:  Karen L Hughes; Hilary Sargeant; Anna L Hawkes
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?

Authors:  W Söllner; A DeVries; E Steixner; P Lukas; G Sprinzl; G Rumpold; S Maislinger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Issues patients would like to discuss at their review consultation: variation by early and late stage oral, oropharyngeal and laryngeal subsites.

Authors:  A Kanatas; N Ghazali; D Lowe; M Udberg; J Heseltine; E O'Mahony; S N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Appropriate and necessary oral care for people with cancer: guidance to obtain the right oral and dental care at the right time.

Authors:  Joel B Epstein; Pelin Güneri; Andrei Barasch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Holistic needs assessment in advanced, intensively treated multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  E G Boland; J W Boland; Y Ezaydi; D M Greenfield; S H Ahmedzai; J A Snowden
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Anastasios Kanatas; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.236

5.  Patients' experience of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and their perspective on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Arnold Degboe; Sarah L Knight; Katarina Halling; Andrew Trigg; Tamara Al-Zubeidi; Natalie Aldhouse; Helen Kitchen; Lori Wirth; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.