Literature DB >> 24923963

Characteristics and referral of head and neck cancer patients who report chewing and dental issues on the Patient Concerns Inventory.

R Mahmood1, C Butterworth1, D Lowe2, S N Rogers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients experience considerable dental-related difficulties following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment including problems with chewing, dry mouth, oral hygiene, appearance and self-esteem. These can go unrecognised in busy follow-up clinics. The Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) is specifically for HNC patients, enabling them to select topics they wish to discuss and members of the multi-professional team they want to see. AIM: The study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients raising dental concerns on the PCI and to explore the outcome of onward referral. Assessments included the PCI and the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) version 4, with clinic details collated from hospital and cancer databases.
METHOD: PCI data were obtained from 317 HNC patients between 2007 and 2011. Their mean age was 63 years and 60% were male. Most had oral squamous cell carcinoma and underwent surgery. The median (IQR) time from treatment to first PCI was 13 (4-42) months.
RESULTS: Three comparison groups were identified: patients with significant chewing problems, patients without significant chewing problems who wanted to discuss dental-related concerns and patients without significant chewing problems who did not want to discuss such concerns. Fifty-two percent reported either a significant chewing problem on the UW-QOL or a wish to discuss dental-related concerns. A quarter specifically asked to talk to a dental professional. Clinical characteristics significantly associated with dental issues were stage, primary treatment and free flap reconstruction. Clinic letters were copied to only 10% of general dental practitioners (GDPs).
CONCLUSION: Better communication with GDPs is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923963     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  32 in total

1.  Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  M A Awad; D Locker; N Korner-Bitensky; J S Feine
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Adjuvant radiotherapy and health-related quality of life of patients at intermediate risk of recurrence following primary surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  F Bekiroglu; N Ghazali; R Laycock; C Katre; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  A survey of antibiotic prescribing by maxillofacial consultants for dental extractions following radiotherapy to the oral cavity.

Authors:  A N Kanatas; S N Rogers; M V Martin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2002-02-09       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Survey of oral rehabilitation in a consecutive series of 130 patients treated by primary resection for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S N Rogers; J Panasar; K Pritchard; D Lowe; R Howell; J I Cawood
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 5.  Dental rehabilitation after surgery for oral cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Pace-Balzan; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Functional status of patients with oral cancer and its relation to style of coping, social support and psychological status.

Authors:  K A Hassanein; B T Musgrove; E Bradbury
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Uncovering patients' concerns in routine head and neck oncology follow up clinics: an exploratory study.

Authors:  N Ghazali; B Roe; D Lowe; S N Rogers
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 1.651

8.  Head and neck cancer services: views of patients, their families and professionals.

Authors:  D Edwards
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Xerostomia after treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer using the University of Washington saliva domain and a Xerostomia-Related Quality-of-Life Scale.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Ian A Johnson; Derek Lowe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Oral cancer awareness of general medical and general dental practitioners.

Authors:  L M Carter; G R Ogden
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  3 in total

1.  Trends in the 15D health-related quality of life over the first year following diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  K Aro; L Bäck; V Loimu; K Saarilahti; S Rogers; H Sintonen; R Roine; Antti Mäkitie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The impact of pre-radiotherapy dental extractions on head and neck cancer patients: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S Clough; M Burke; B Daly; S Scambler
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Anastasios Kanatas; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.236

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.