Literature DB >> 21679300

Comparison of a new length measurement technique for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to standard techniques: outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Gerard Henry1, Laura Houghton, Daniel Culkin, Juan Otheguy, Ridwan Shabsigh, Dana A Ohl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Within a study evaluating the redesigned AMS 700MS inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA), one site used new length measurement technique (NLMT), a more aggressive dilation and measurement of the corpora cavernosa on a stretched penis, to address penile shortening. AIM: To compare cylinder size and patient satisfaction, between a NLMT and traditional sizing for IPP implantation.
METHODS: Fourteen men received IPPs using NLMT, and 55 with traditional sizing. Nationwide sales data from 2005 to 2008 for AMS 700 IPPs was obtained from AMS for comparison; additional surveys captured patient satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Demographic data, cylinder sizes, and patient satisfaction were compared between the NLMT and standard techniques.
RESULTS: The Fisher's exact test (P<0.001) showed a significant difference between the cylinder sizes with NLMT as compared with standard techniques. Of the 14 NLMT patients, 71.4% (10) received cylinders>21 cm long and 28.6% (4) received cylinders<21 cm long, as compared with 12.7% (7) and 87.3% (48), respectively, for patients implanted by traditional techniques. There were ethnic differences between the samples: 42.9% (6) NLMT patients were of African-American descent, as compared with 10.9% (6) in the standard technique group. However, longer cylinders were utilized more often, with 83.3% (5) of African-Americans treated using the NLMT; as compared with 33.3% (2) of the standard technique group. Nationwide data reveal 12.3% of patients routinely receive 21 cm cylinders. At 6 months postimplantation, patient satisfaction with NLMT was no different than standard techniques. There were no distal erosions, complications, infections, or pain concerns reported through 24 months among the NLMT patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The NLMT resulted in a larger number of subjects implanted with larger cylinders. Satisfaction with performance and complication rates for NLMT patients was comparable to those implanted using standard techniques.
© 2011 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21679300     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of infrapubic versus transcrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report.

Authors:  L W Trost; A G Boonjindasup; W J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  The evolution of the inflatable penile prosthetic device and surgical innovations with anatomical considerations.

Authors:  Tariq S Hakky; Run Wang; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Optimizing Outcomes in the Virgin Penile Implant Patient.

Authors:  Charles Welliver
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Pharmacologically induced erect penile length and stretched penile length are both good predictors of post-inflatable prosthesis penile length.

Authors:  E C Osterberg; A Maganty; R Ramasamy; J F Eid
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Shortened penis post penile prosthesis implantation treated with subcutaneous soft silicone penile implant: case report.

Authors:  V Shirvanian; G Lemperle; C Araujo Pinto; J J Elist
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Raymond M Bernal; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-26

8.  Evaluation of Satisfaction and Axial Rigidity with Titan XL Cylinders.

Authors:  Gerard D Henry; Caroline Jennermann; J Francois Eid
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-09-11

Review 9.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

10.  Patient satisfaction and penile morphology changes with postoperative penile rehabilitation 2 years after Coloplast Titan prosthesis.

Authors:  Michael B Pryor; Rafael Carrion; Run Wang; Gerard Henry
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.