Literature DB >> 21676096

Exploring the perceptual spaces of faces, cars and birds in children and adults.

James W Tanaka1, Tamara L Meixner, Justin Kantner.   

Abstract

While much developmental research has focused on the strategies that children employ to recognize faces, less is known about the principles governing the organization of face exemplars in perceptual memory. In this study, we tested a novel, child-friendly paradigm for investigating the organization of face, bird and car exemplars. Children ages 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12 and adults were presented with 50/50 morphs of typical and atypical face, bird and car parent images. Participants were asked to judge whether the 50/50 morph more strongly resembled the typical or the atypical parent image. Young and older children and adults showed a systematic bias to the atypical faces and birds, but no bias toward the atypical cars. Collectively, these findings argue that by the age of 3, children encode and organize faces, birds and cars in a perceptual space that is strikingly similar to that of adults. Category organization for both children and adults follows Krumhansl's (1978) distance-density principle in which the similarity between two exemplars is jointly determined by their physical appearance and the density of neighboring exemplars in the perceptual space.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21676096      PMCID: PMC3117253          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01023.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  25 in total

Review 1.  Beyond prototypes: asymmetries in infant categorization and what they teach us about the mechanisms guiding early knowledge acquisition.

Authors:  Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  2002

2.  Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson; Gunter Loffler; Frances Wilkinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects.

Authors:  Sandy Sangrigoli; Scania de Schonen
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-02

4.  Experience produces the atypicality bias in object perception.

Authors:  Justin Kantne; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1986-04

6.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.

Authors:  L L Light; F Kayra-Stuart; S Hollander
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1979-05

7.  Abstraction of prototypical information by adults and 10-month-old infants.

Authors:  M S Strauss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1979-11

8.  Typicality and familiarity of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; S Hurry; W Thorley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-05

9.  Children's recognition of caricatures.

Authors:  Paul P W Chang; Susan C Levine; Philip J Benson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-11

10.  Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pellicano; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Paul C Quinn; Buyun Xu; Kim Maynard; Natalie Huxtable; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-04-18

2.  How category structure influences the perception of object similarity: the atypicality bias.

Authors:  James William Tanaka; Justin Kantner; Marni Bartlett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.