Literature DB >> 21673017

Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science.

Martyn D Pickersgill1.   

Abstract

Citizens today are increasingly expected to be knowledgeable about and prepared to engage with biomedical knowledge. In this article, I wish to reframe this 'public understanding of science' project, and place fresh emphasis on public understandings of research: an engagement with the everyday laboratory practices of biomedicine and its associated ethics, rather than with specific scientific facts. This is not based on an assumption that non-scientists are 'ignorant' and are thus unable to 'appropriately' use or debate science; rather, it is underpinned by an empirically-grounded observation that some individuals may be unfamiliar with certain specificities of particular modes of research and ethical frameworks, and, as a consequence, have their autonomy compromised when invited to participate in biomedical investigations. Drawing on the perspectives of participants in my own sociological research on the social and ethical dimensions of neuroscience, I argue that public understanding of biomedical research and its ethics should be developed both at the community level and within the research moment itself in order to enhance autonomy and promote more socially robust science. Public bioethics will have to play a key role in such an endeavour, and indeed will contribute in important ways to the opening up of new spaces of symmetrical engagement between bioethicists, scientists and wider publics-and hence to the democratisation of the bioethical enterprise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673017      PMCID: PMC3540974          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.041954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Drawing the line: an analysis of lay people's discussions about the new genetics.

Authors:  Anne Kerr; Sarah Cunningham-Burley; Amanda Amos
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  1998-04

2.  Tweeting science and ethics: social media as a tool for constructive public engagement.

Authors:  Alan C Regenberg
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Public bioethics and public engagement: the politics of "proper talk".

Authors:  Alfred Moore
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2010-03

4.  Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment.

Authors:  Norma Morris; Brian Bàlmer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 6.  Public knowledge and public trust.

Authors:  Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2006

7.  Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent.

Authors:  Oonagh Corrigan
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2003-11

8.  Refusing the information paradigm: informed consent, medical research, and patient participation.

Authors:  Ulrike Felt; Milena D Bister; Michael Strassnig; Ursula Wagner
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2009-01

9.  Consenting futures: professional views on social, clinical and ethical aspects of information feedback to embryo donors in human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Clare Williams; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2010-06
  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Focusing on Cause or Cure?: Priorities and Stakeholder Presence in Childhood Psychiatry Research.

Authors:  Lauren C Milner; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2014-01-01

2.  Adolescent Research Participants' Descriptions of Medical Research.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Isabella Nogues; Lori Wiener; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-02-19

3.  The Moral of the Tale: Stories, Trust, and Public Engagement with Clinical Ethics via Radio and Theatre.

Authors:  Deborah Bowman
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Meeting the needs of underserved populations: setting the agenda for more inclusive citizen science of medicine.

Authors:  Amelia Fiske; Barbara Prainsack; Alena Buyx
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  A consideration of the social dimensions and implications of neuroimaging research in global health, as related to the theory-ladened and theory-generating aspects of technology.

Authors:  Martyn Pickersgill
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  From 'implications' to 'dimensions': science, medicine and ethics in society.

Authors:  Martyn D Pickersgill
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-03

7.  Utilizing social media to study information-seeking and ethical issues in gene therapy.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Louise Whiteley; Thomas Wade Johnson; Jonathan Lim; Wyeth W Wasserman; Judy Illes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  The Movement of Research from the Laboratory to the Living Room: a Case Study of Public Engagement with Cognitive Science.

Authors:  Tineke Broer; Martyn Pickersgill; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.480

9.  Developing Biopsychosocial Research on Maternal Mental Health in Malawi: Community Perspectives and Concerns.

Authors:  Lucinda Manda-Taylor; Eric Umar; Robert C Stewart; Macdonald Kufankomwe; Genesis Chorwe-Sungani; Owen C Mwale; Demoubly Kokota; Joyce Nyirenda; Kazione Kulisewa; Martyn Pickersgill
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2021-07

10.  Structural coercion in the context of community engagement in global health research conducted in a low resource setting in Africa.

Authors:  Deborah Nyirenda; Salla Sariola; Patricia Kingori; Bertie Squire; Chiwoza Bandawe; Michael Parker; Nicola Desmond
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.