Literature DB >> 19103717

Refusing the information paradigm: informed consent, medical research, and patient participation.

Ulrike Felt1, Milena D Bister, Michael Strassnig, Ursula Wagner.   

Abstract

This article challenges the assumption that patient autonomy can best be assured by providing proper information through formalized procedures such as informed consent. We suggest that to understand and consider laypeople's ways of knowing and decision making, one has to move beyond the information paradigm and take into account a much broader context. Concretely, we investigate informed consent in connection with donating skin tissue remaining from medically indicated surgery. We use interviews with patients and observation protocols to analyse patients' perceptions and ways of making sense of informed consent beyond its bioethical ideal. Patients situate themselves in a larger system of solidarity, enroll in an overall positive image of science as a linear process of innovation oriented towards output, and simultaneously take a pragmatic stance towards hospital routines as a necessary passage point towards receiving good treatment. Because informed consent is one of the central articulations between the biomedical system and society, we conclude by reflecting on the consequences of our findings on a socio-political level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19103717     DOI: 10.1177/1363459308097362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health (London)        ISSN: 1363-4593


  8 in total

1.  Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science.

Authors:  Martyn D Pickersgill
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Contributing to research via biobanks: what it means to cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Pellegrini; Christian Chabannon; Julien Mancini; Frederic Viret; Norbert Vey; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  "I had already made up my mind": patients and caregivers' perspectives on making the decision to participate in research at a US cancer referral center.

Authors:  Kathleen Shannon-Dorcy; Denise J Drevdahl
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.

Authors:  Kristian Pollock
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Family and healthcare professionals' perceptions of a pilot hospice at home programme for children: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria Brenner; Michael Connolly; Des Cawley; Frances Howlin; Jay Berry; Claire Quinn
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Ethical frameworks for obtaining informed consent in tumour profiling: an evidence-based case for Singapore.

Authors:  Yasmin Bylstra; Tamra Lysaght; Jyothi Thrivikraman; Sangeetha Watson; Patrick Tan
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.639

7.  Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.

Authors:  Gabrielle Natalie Samuel; Sandi Dheensa; Bobbie Farsides; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Face and Content Validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for the Treatment of Iranian Patients.

Authors:  Ali Saber; Seyed Mahmoud Tabatabaei; Godarz Akasheh; Mojtaba Sehat; Zahra Zanjani; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2017-09-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.