Literature DB >> 27004235

Adolescent Research Participants' Descriptions of Medical Research.

Christine Grady1, Isabella Nogues2, Lori Wiener3, Benjamin S Wilfond4, David Wendler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence shows both a tendency for research participants to conflate research and clinical care and limited public understanding of research. Conflation of research and care by participants is often referred to as the therapeutic misconception. Despite a lack of evidence, few studies have explicitly asked participants, and especially minors, to explain what they think research is and how they think it differs from regular medical care.
METHODS: As part of a longer semi-structured interview evaluating assent and parental permission for research, adolescent research participants, including adolescents with illnesses and healthy volunteers (N=177), and their parents (N=177) were asked to describe medical research in their own words and say whether and how they thought being in medical research was different from seeing a regular doctor. Qualitative responses were coded and themes identified through an iterative process.
RESULTS: When asked to describe medical research, the majority described research in terms of its goals of helping to advance science, develop treatments and medicines, and help others; fewer described research as having the goal of helping particular research participants, and fewer still in terms of the methods used in research. The majority of teen and parent respondents said being in research is different than seeing a regular doctor and explained this by describing different goals, different or more procedures, differences in the engagement of the doctors/researchers, and in logistics.
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents participating in clinical research and their parents generally describe medical research in terms of its goals of advancing science and finding new medicines and treatments, sometimes in combination with helping the enrolled individuals. The majority perceives a difference between research and regular medical care and described these differences in various ways. Further exploration is warranted about how such perceived differences matter to participants and how this understanding could be used to enhance informed consent and the overall research experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assent and parental consent; clinical research; ethics; therapeutic misconception

Year:  2015        PMID: 27004235      PMCID: PMC4797334          DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1017059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth        ISSN: 2329-4515


  15 in total

1.  Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding.

Authors:  M Miller
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Charles W Lidz; Thomas Grisso
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

3.  Communication and miscommunication in informed consent to research.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2004-12

4.  Time to stop worrying about the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  David S Wendler
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2012

5.  Research participants' "irrational" expectations: common or commonly mismeasured?

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim; Raymond de Vries; Renee Wilson; Sonali Parnami; Samuel Frank; Karl Kieburtz; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

6.  Assent in research: the voices of adolescents.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Lori Wiener; Emily Abdoler; Emily Trauernicht; Sima Zadeh; Douglas S Diekema; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question?

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Daniel P Sulmasy; Alan B Astrow; Herbert I Hurwitz; Roger B Cohen; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Emily Abdoler; Lori Wiener; Christine Grady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measure.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Milena Anatchkova; Karen Albert; Laura B Dunn; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Larry R Churchill; Arlene M Davis; Michele M Easter; Christine Grady; Steven Joffe; Nancy Kass; Nancy M P King; Charles W Lidz; Franklin G Miller; Daniel K Nelson; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Barbra Bluestone Rothschild; Pamela Sankar; Benjamin S Wilfond; Catherine R Zimmer
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Competence to Consent to Oral and Injectable PrEP Trials Among Adolescent Males Who Have Sex with Males.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Leah Ibrahim Puri; Kathryn Macapagal; Leah Feuerstahler; Jungwon Rachael Ahn; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-11-27

2.  "Free Testing and PrEP without Outing Myself to Parents:" Motivation to participate in oral and injectable PrEP clinical trials among adolescent men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Leah Ibrahim Puri; Kathryn Macapagal; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.