Literature DB >> 21671794

Active data collection for efficient estimation and comparison of nonlinear neural models.

Christopher DiMattina1, Kechen Zhang.   

Abstract

The stimulus-response relationship of many sensory neurons is nonlinear, but fully quantifying this relationship by a complex nonlinear model may require too much data to be experimentally tractable. Here we present a theoretical study of a general two-stage computational method that may help to significantly reduce the number of stimuli needed to obtain an accurate mathematical description of nonlinear neural responses. Our method of active data collection first adaptively generates stimuli that are optimal for estimating the parameters of competing nonlinear models and then uses these estimates to generate stimuli online that are optimal for discriminating these models. We applied our method to simple hierarchical circuit models, including nonlinear networks built on the spatiotemporal or spectral-temporal receptive fields, and confirmed that collecting data using our two-stage adaptive algorithm was far more effective for estimating and comparing competing nonlinear sensory processing models than standard nonadaptive methods using random stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21671794     DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  14 in total

1.  Fitting of dynamic recurrent neural network models to sensory stimulus-response data.

Authors:  R Ozgur Doruk; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 1.365

2.  Online stimulus optimization rapidly reveals multidimensional selectivity in auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Kamal Sen; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A hierarchical adaptive approach to optimal experimental design.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mark Steyvers; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Planning Beyond the Next Trial in Adaptive Experiments: A Dynamic Programming Approach.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-18

5.  Adaptive stimulus selection for multi-alternative psychometric functions with lapses.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Bak; Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Dethroning the Fano Factor: A Flexible, Model-Based Approach to Partitioning Neural Variability.

Authors:  Adam S Charles; Mijung Park; J Patrick Weller; Gregory D Horwitz; Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Active learning of cortical connectivity from two-photon imaging data.

Authors:  Martín A Bertrán; Natalia L Martínez; Ye Wang; David Dunson; Guillermo Sapiro; Dario Ringach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  ADOpy: a python package for adaptive design optimization.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Yang; Mark A Pitt; Woo-Young Ahn; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

9.  A hierarchical Bayesian approach to adaptive vision testing: A case study with the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Hairong Gu; Woojae Kim; Fang Hou; Luis Andres Lesmes; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jay I Myung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Adaptive stimulus optimization for sensory systems neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.