Literature DB >> 19649686

Multi-center study evaluating circulating tumor cells as a surrogate for response to treatment and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer.

Seigo Nakamura1, Hiroshi Yagata, Shinji Ohno, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, Hiroji Iwata, Nobuyuki Tsunoda, Yoshinori Ito, Nahomi Tokudome, Masakazu Toi, Katsumasa Kuroi, Eiji Suzuki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is one way to predict outcome and monitor treatment in patients with MBC. In this prospective study, we evaluated CTCs in predicting treatment efficacy and overall survival (OS) using the CellSearch System (Veridex, LLC, Raritan, NJ).
METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients with MBC with measurable disease were enrolled. Samples of 7.5 ml of blood from 107 eligible patients were tested for CTCs before starting therapy (baseline), after one cycle of therapy (3-4 weeks) and at 12 weeks. We compared CTC levels and imaging at baseline and at 12 weeks. Next, we determined the hazard ratios (HR) by comparing cases with zero CTCs to those with one or more CTCs. Moreover, HR was calculated when comparing cases that had greater than or equal to a certain number of CTCs to those with less than the number of CTCs.
RESULTS: This study shows the incidence of detection of CTCs in patients with metastatic breast cancers. Of the patients, 64.4% (76/118) had one or more CTCs, and 37.3% (44/118) had five or more CTCs. First we set the baseline number of CTCs as 100%. Of the seven cases whose level of CTCs decreased more than 90%, six (85.7%) demonstrated a positive response (complete response and partial response) by imaging after one cycle (3-4 weeks later). For the patients whose CTC levels increased above 100% after one cycle (3-4 weeks later), 7 of 11 (63.6%) had progressive disease (PD). The HR for cases with five to ten CTCs was greater than 1.00 [HR = 2.450; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.727-8.248]. Statistical significance was observed when comparing patients who had > or =3 CTCs to those with <3 CTCs (P = 0.0273). When comparing cases with > or =5 CTCs to those with <5 CTCs, the hazard ratio was 3.069 (95% CI 1.496-6.295; P = 0.0022).
CONCLUSIONS: Because the change in the number of CTCs was highly correlated with results from imaging before and after therapy, CTCs can be considered a biomarker that may predict the effect of treatment earlier than imaging modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19649686     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0139-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  42 in total

Review 1.  Circulating tumour cells and cell-free DNA as tools for managing breast cancer.

Authors:  Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Javier Cortes; Libero Santarpia; Ana Vivancos; Josep Tabernero; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Joan Seoane
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lu Han; Wei Chen; Qicheng Zhao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-12

3.  Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prognostic and Predictive Marker.

Authors:  Sayyed Farshid Moussavi-Harami; Kari B Wisinski; David J Beebe
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2014

4.  Prognostic value of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Seigo Nakamura; Yasuharu Tokuda; Yuji Shimoda; Hiroshi Yagata; Atsushi Yoshida; Hidekazu Ota; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Massimo Cristofanilli; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  MicroRNA-154/ADAM9 axis inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Chengwei Qin; Yanming Zhao; Chunzhi Gong; Zhenlin Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Isolation of viable cancer cells in antibody-functionalized microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Xiangjun Zheng; Linan Jiang; Joyce Schroeder; Alison Stopeck; Yitshak Zohar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  The comparison of miRNAs that respond to anti-breast cancer drugs and usnic acid for the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Demet Cansaran-Duman; Ümmügülsüm Tanman; Sevcan Yangın; Orhan Atakol
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 8.  Monitoring in metastatic breast cancer: is imaging outdated in the era of circulating tumor cells?

Authors:  Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni; Volkmar Müller; Tanja Fehm; Wolfgang Janni; Brigitte Rack
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in breast cancer: a diagnostic tool for prognosis and molecular analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoshen Dong; Katherine R Alpaugh; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Establishment and validation of circulating tumor cell-based prognostic nomograms in first-line metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio Giordano; Brian L Egleston; David Hajage; Joseph Bland; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; James M Reuben; Jean-Yves Pierga; Massimo Cristofanilli; Francois-Clement Bidard
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.