Literature DB >> 15604995

Significance of serum tumor markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: a prospective study.

Junichi Kurebayashi1, Reiki Nishimura, Katsuhiro Tanaka, Norio Kohno, Masafumi Kurosumi, Takuya Moriya, Yoshinari Ogawa, Tetsuya Taguchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The significance of serum tumor markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients is still controversial. To clarify this issue, the Tumor Marker Study Group of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society conducted a prospective study.
METHODS: Patients with advanced breast cancer who were treated with systemic therapy between January and December 2002 were recruited from five collaborative institutes in Japan. The patients were monitored every four weeks using three serum tumor markers, CEA, CA 15-3 and NCC-ST-439 during the therapy.
RESULTS: Findings from 108 eligible patients were analyzed. The pretreatment positivity rates were 51.9% for CEA, 50% for CA 15-3, and 34.3% for NCC-ST-439. The changes in each marker level at 8 and 12 weeks but not at 4 weeks after the start of therapy seemed to correlate with the response to therapy in pretreatment marker-positive patients but not in negative patients. The Cox proportional hazard model revealed a greater than 20% reduction in CEA, CA 15-3 or NCC-ST-439 levels at 4, 8 and/or 12 weeks after the start of therapy to be an independent predictive factor for longer time-to-progression (TTP) in pretreatment marker-positive patients.
CONCLUSION: This prospective study supported the findings obtained from our previous retrospective study that in pretreatment marker-positive patients 1) the changes in serum tumor marker levels after the start of therapy correlate with the response to therapy; and 2) a greater than 20% reduction in the tumor marker levels was a favorable predictive factor for TTP during systemic therapy. When the pretreatment serum level of these markers is over the respective cut-off value, sequential measurement of them may be useful for evaluating the efficacy of treatment as well as monitoring the outcome of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604995     DOI: 10.1007/bf02968047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  20 in total

1.  Clinical utility of serum tumor markers and circulating tumor cell assays in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Vandana G Abramson; Ingrid A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Prognostic value of HER2-positive circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Seigo Nakamura; Yasuharu Tokuda; Yuji Shimoda; Hiroshi Yagata; Atsushi Yoshida; Hidekazu Ota; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Massimo Cristofanilli; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  VALIDATION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT BY BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH BONE-ONLY METASTATIC BREAST CANCERS DURING ZOLEDRONIC ACID TREATMENT: COMPARISON WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT.

Authors:  Shirou Ishii; Ken Kikuchi; Masayuki Miyajima; Kotaro Sakuma; Fumio Shishido
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-03

4.  Development and verification of a prediction model using serum tumor markers to predict the response to chemotherapy of patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  Kan Yonemori; Noriyuki Katsumata; Ayako Noda; Hajime Uno; Mayu Yunokawa; Eriko Nakano; Tsutomu Kouno; Chikako Shimizu; Masashi Ando; Kenji Tamura; Masahiro Takeuchi; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Elevation of serum CEA and CA15-3 levels during antitumor therapy predicts poor therapeutic response in advanced breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Huijuan Zhang; Mingyan Zhang; Qingwei Meng; Li Cai; Qingyuan Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

Authors:  Andrey Iskrenov Kotzev; Peter Vassilev Draganov
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 7.  Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Molecular Era.

Authors:  Shumei Kato; Ahmed Alsafar; Vighnesh Walavalkar; John Hainsworth; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2021-01-28

8.  Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  F Ayala de la Peña; B Ortiz-Muñoz; T Quintanar-Verdúguez; J D Santotoribio; S de la Cruz; J Trapé-Pujol; E Galve-Calvo; J M Augé-Fradera; J García-Gómez; Á González-Hernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Prognostic value of monitoring tumour markers CA 15-3 and CEA during fulvestrant treatment.

Authors:  Rupert Bartsch; Catharina Wenzel; Ursula Pluschnig; Dagmar Hussian; Ursula Sevelda; Gabriela Altorjai; Gottfried J Locker; Robert Mader; Christoph C Zielinski; Guenther G Steger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-26       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  CA 15-3 is predictive of response and disease recurrence following treatment in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Dhafir Al-azawi; Gabrielle Kelly; Eddie Myers; Enda W McDermott; Arnold D K Hill; Michael J Duffy; Niall O Higgins
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.