Literature DB >> 21667317

Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control.

Chetan Maringanti1, Indrajeet Chaubey, Mazdak Arabi, Bernard Engel.   

Abstract

Nonpoint source (NPS) pollutants such as phosphorus, nitrogen, sediment, and pesticides are the foremost sources of water contamination in many of the water bodies in the Midwestern agricultural watersheds. This problem is expected to increase in the future with the increasing demand to provide corn as grain or stover for biofuel production. Best management practices (BMPs) have been proven to effectively reduce the NPS pollutant loads from agricultural areas. However, in a watershed with multiple farms and multiple BMPs feasible for implementation, it becomes a daunting task to choose a right combination of BMPs that provide maximum pollution reduction for least implementation costs. Multi-objective algorithms capable of searching from a large number of solutions are required to meet the given watershed management objectives. Genetic algorithms have been the most popular optimization algorithms for the BMP selection and placement. However, previous BMP optimization models did not study pesticide which is very commonly used in corn areas. Also, with corn stover being projected as a viable alternative for biofuel production there might be unintended consequences of the reduced residue in the corn fields on water quality. Therefore, there is a need to study the impact of different levels of residue management in combination with other BMPs at a watershed scale. In this research the following BMPs were selected for placement in the watershed: (a) residue management, (b) filter strips, (c) parallel terraces, (d) contour farming, and (e) tillage. We present a novel method of combing different NPS pollutants into a single objective function, which, along with the net costs, were used as the two objective functions during optimization. In this study we used BMP tool, a database that contains the pollution reduction and cost information of different BMPs under consideration which provides pollutant loads during optimization. The BMP optimization was performed using a NSGA-II based search method. The model was tested for the selection and placement of BMPs in Wildcat Creek Watershed, a corn dominated watershed located in northcentral Indiana, to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, and pesticide losses from the watershed. The Pareto optimal fronts (plotted as spider plots) generated between the optimized objective functions can be used to make management decisions to achieve desired water quality goals with minimum BMP implementation and maintenance cost for the watershed. Also these solutions were geographically mapped to show the locations where various BMPs should be implemented. The solutions with larger pollution reduction consisted of buffer filter strips that lead to larger pollution reduction with greater costs compared to other alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21667317     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9696-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Multi-objective genetic algorithms: problem difficulties and construction of test problems.

Authors:  K Deb
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.277

2.  Assessment of total maximum daily load implementation strategies for nitrate impairment of the Raccoon River, Iowa.

Authors:  K Manoj; Calvin F Wolter; Keith E Schilling; Philip W Gassman
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  The new gold rush: fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality.

Authors:  Thomas W Simpson; Andrew N Sharpley; Robert W Howarth; Hans W Paerl; Kyle R Mankin
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  Assessment of risk reduction strategies for the management of agricultural nonpoint source pesticide runoff in estuarine ecosystems.

Authors:  G I Scott; M H Fulton; D W Moore; E F Wirth; G T Chandler; P B Key; J W Daugomah; E D Strozier; J Devane; J R Clark; M A Lewis; D B Finley; W Ellenberg; K J Karnaky
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone.

Authors:  Sergey Rabotyagov; Todd Campbell; Manoj Jha; Philip W Gassman; Jeffrey Arnold; Lyubov Kurkalova; Silvia Secchi; Hongli Feng; Catherine L Kling
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin.

Authors:  Richard B Alexander; Richard A Smith; Gregory E Schwarz; Elizabeth W Boyer; Jacqueline V Nolan; John W Brakebill
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Drinking-water herbicide exposure in Indiana and prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and preterm delivery.

Authors:  Hugo Ochoa-Acuña; Jane Frankenberger; Leighanne Hahn; Cristina Carbajo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Analysis of field-scale spatial correlations and variations of soil nutrients using geostatistics.

Authors:  Ruimin Liu; Fei Xu; Wenwen Yu; Jianhan Shi; Peipei Zhang; Zhenyao Shen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Effect of nutrient management planning on crop yield, nitrate leaching and sediment loading in Thomas Brook watershed.

Authors:  Frederick Amon-Armah; Emmanuel K Yiridoe; Nafees H M Ahmad; Dale Hebb; Rob Jamieson; David Burton; Ali Madani
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Discharge permit market and farm management nexus: an approach for eutrophication control in small basins with low-income farmers.

Authors:  Somaye Imani; Mohammad Hossein Niksokhan; Shervin Jamshidi; Karim C Abbaspour
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Planning for agricultural return flow allocation: application of info-gap decision theory and a nonlinear CVaR-based optimization model.

Authors:  Maryam Soltani; Reza Kerachian; Mohammad Reza Nikoo; Hamideh Noory
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  An in-depth examination of farmers' perceptions of targeting conservation practices.

Authors:  Margaret Kalcic; Linda Prokopy; Jane Frankenberger; Indrajeet Chaubey
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  No-tillage effects on N and P exports across a rice-planted watershed.

Authors:  Xinqiang Liang; Zhibo Wang; Yixiang Zhang; Chunyan Zhu; Limin Lin; Lixian Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Agricultural runoff pollution control by a grassed swales coupled with wetland detention ponds system: a case study in Taihu Basin, China.

Authors:  Jinhui Zhao; Yaqian Zhao; Xiaoli Zhao; Cheng Jiang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.

Authors:  Amy T Hansen; Todd Campbell; Se Jong Cho; Jonathan A Czuba; Brent J Dalzell; Christine L Dolph; Peter L Hawthorne; Sergey Rabotyagov; Zhengxin Lang; Karthik Kumarasamy; Patrick Belmont; Jacques C Finlay; Efi Foufoula-Georgiou; Karen B Gran; Catherine L Kling; Peter Wilcock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An auto-adaptive optimization approach for targeting nonpoint source pollution control practices.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Guoyuan Wei; Zhenyao Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A topography analysis incorporated optimization method for the selection and placement of best management practices.

Authors:  Zhenyao Shen; Lei Chen; Liang Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.