Literature DB >> 18268293

The new gold rush: fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality.

Thomas W Simpson1, Andrew N Sharpley, Robert W Howarth, Hans W Paerl, Kyle R Mankin.   

Abstract

Renewable fuel production, particularly grain-based ethanol, is expanding rapidly in the USA. Although subsidized grain-based ethanol may provide a competitively priced transportation fuel, concerns exist about potential environmental impacts. This contribution focuses on potential water quality implications of expanded grain-based ethanol production and potential impacts of perennial-grass-based cellulosic ethanol. Expanded grain-based ethanol will increase and intensify corn production. Even with recommended fertilizer and land conservation measures, corn acreage can be a major source of N loss to water (20-40 kg ha(-1) yr(-1)). A greater acreage of corn is estimated to increase N and P loss to water by 37% (117 million kg) and 25% (9 million kg), respectively, and measures to encourage adoption of conservation practices are essential to mitigate water quality impairments. Dried distiller's grains remaining after ethanol production from corn grain are used as animal feed and can increase manure P content and may increase N content. Cellulosic fuel-stocks from perennials such as switchgrass and woody materials have the potential to produce ethanol. Although production, storage, and handling of cellulosic materials and conversion technology are limitations, accelerating development of cellulosic ethanol has the potential to reduce dependence on grain fuel-stocks and provide water quality and other environmental benefits. All alternative fuel production technologies could have environmental impacts. There is a need to understand these impacts to help guide policy and help make programmatic and scientific decisions that avoid or mitigate unintended environmental consequences of biofuel production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18268293     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  8 in total

1.  Economic linkages to changing landscapes.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Peterson; Marcellus M Caldas; Jason S Bergtold; Belinda S Sturm; Russell W Graves; Dietrich Earnhart; Eric A Hanley; J Christopher Brown
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control.

Authors:  Chetan Maringanti; Indrajeet Chaubey; Mazdak Arabi; Bernard Engel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.

Authors:  Esther S Parish; Keith L Kline; Virginia H Dale; Rebecca A Efroymson; Allen C McBride; Timothy L Johnson; Michael R Hilliard; Jeffrey M Bielicki
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Estimating Nitrogen Load Resulting from Biofuel Mandates.

Authors:  Mohammad Alshawaf; Ellen Douglas; Karen Ricciardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Added Values of Time Series in Material Flow Analysis: The Austrian Phosphorus Budget from 1990 to 2011.

Authors:  Ottavia Zoboli; David Laner; Matthias Zessner; Helmut Rechberger
Journal:  J Ind Ecol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.946

6.  Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard.

Authors:  Tyler J Lark; Nathan P Hendricks; Aaron Smith; Nicholas Pates; Seth A Spawn-Lee; Matthew Bougie; Eric G Booth; Christopher J Kucharik; Holly K Gibbs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Increased toxicity of Karenia brevis during phosphate limited growth: ecological and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Donnie Ransom Hardison; William G Sunda; Damian Shea; Richard Wayne Litaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Mitigating Toxic Planktonic Cyanobacterial Blooms in Aquatic Ecosystems Facing Increasing Anthropogenic and Climatic Pressures.

Authors:  Hans W Paerl
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.546

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.