Literature DB >> 34260382

Integrated assessment modeling reveals near-channel management as cost-effective to improve water quality in agricultural watersheds.

Amy T Hansen1,2, Todd Campbell3, Se Jong Cho4,5, Jonathan A Czuba4,6, Brent J Dalzell7,8, Christine L Dolph9,10, Peter L Hawthorne11, Sergey Rabotyagov12, Zhengxin Lang12, Karthik Kumarasamy13, Patrick Belmont13, Jacques C Finlay9, Efi Foufoula-Georgiou4,14,15, Karen B Gran16, Catherine L Kling3,10, Peter Wilcock13.   

Abstract

Despite decades of policy that strives to reduce nutrient and sediment export from agricultural fields, surface water quality in intensively managed agricultural landscapes remains highly degraded. Recent analyses show that current conservation efforts are not sufficient to reverse widespread water degradation in Midwestern agricultural systems. Intensifying row crop agriculture and increasing climate pressure require a more integrated approach to water quality management that addresses diverse sources of nutrients and sediment and off-field mitigation actions. We used multiobjective optimization analysis and integrated three biophysical models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative portfolios of watershed management practices at achieving nitrate and suspended sediment reduction goals in an agricultural basin of the Upper Midwestern United States. Integrating watershed-scale models enabled the inclusion of near-channel management alongside more typical field management and thus directly the comparison of cost-effectiveness across portfolios. The optimization analysis revealed that fluvial wetlands (i.e., wide, slow-flowing, vegetated water bodies within the riverine corridor) are the single-most cost-effective management action to reduce both nitrate and sediment loads and will be essential for meeting moderate to aggressive water quality targets. Although highly cost-effective, wetland construction was costly compared to other practices, and it was not selected in portfolios at low investment levels. Wetland performance was sensitive to placement, emphasizing the importance of watershed scale planning to realize potential benefits of wetland restorations. We conclude that extensive interagency cooperation and coordination at a watershed scale is required to achieve substantial, economically viable improvements in water quality under intensive row crop agricultural production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agriculture; integrated assessment modeling; water quality; wetlands

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34260382      PMCID: PMC8285912          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024912118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control.

Authors:  Chetan Maringanti; Indrajeet Chaubey; Mazdak Arabi; Bernard Engel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Large shift in source of fine sediment in the upper Mississippi river.

Authors:  Patrick Belmont; Karen B Gran; Shawn P Schottler; Peter R Wilcock; Stephanie S Day; Carrie Jennings; J Wesley Lauer; Enrica Viparelli; Jane K Willenbring; Daniel R Engstrom; Gary Parker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes.

Authors:  E Sinha; A M Michalak; V Balaji
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Environmental and economic trade-offs in a watershed when using corn stover for bioenergy.

Authors:  Benjamin M Gramig; Carson J Reeling; Raj Cibin; Indrajeet Chaubey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Identifying congruence in stream assemblage thresholds in response to nutrient and sediment gradients for limit setting.

Authors:  Annika Wagenhoff; Joanne E Clapcott; Kelvin E M Lau; Gillian D Lewis; Roger G Young
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Landscape Drivers of Dynamic Change in Water Quality of U.S. Rivers.

Authors:  Edward G Stets; Lori A Sprague; Gretchen P Oelsner; Hank M Johnson; Jennifer C Murphy; Karen Ryberg; Aldo V Vecchia; Robert E Zuellig; James A Falcone; Melissa L Riskin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone.

Authors:  Sergey Rabotyagov; Todd Campbell; Manoj Jha; Philip W Gassman; Jeffrey Arnold; Lyubov Kurkalova; Silvia Secchi; Hongli Feng; Catherine L Kling
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services.

Authors:  Bonnie L Keeler; Stephen Polasky; Kate A Brauman; Kris A Johnson; Jacques C Finlay; Ann O'Neill; Kent Kovacs; Brent Dalzell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Nitrate in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 1980 to 2008: are we making progress?

Authors:  Lori A Sprague; Robert M Hirsch; Brent T Aulenbach
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Non-floodplain Wetlands Affect Watershed Nutrient Dynamics: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Heather E Golden; Adnan Rajib; Charles R Lane; Jay R Christensen; Qiusheng Wu; Samson Mengistu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 11.357

View more
  1 in total

1.  Wetland restoration yields dynamic nitrate responses across the Upper Mississippi river basin.

Authors:  Grey R Evenson; Heather E Golden; Jay R Christensen; Charles R Lane; Adnan Rajib; Ellen D'Amico; David Tyler Mahoney; Elaheh White; Qiusheng Wu
Journal:  Environ Res Commun       Date:  2021
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.