Literature DB >> 25073766

An in-depth examination of farmers' perceptions of targeting conservation practices.

Margaret Kalcic1, Linda Prokopy, Jane Frankenberger, Indrajeet Chaubey.   

Abstract

Watershed managers have largely embraced targeting of agricultural conservation as a way to manage strategically non-point source pollution from agricultural lands. However, while targeting of particular watersheds is not uncommon, targeting farms and fields within a specific watershed has lagged. In this work, we employed a qualitative approach, using farmer interviews in west-central Indiana to better understand their views on targeting. Interviews focused on adoption of conservation practices on farmers' lands and identified their views on targeting, disproportionality, and monetary incentives. Results show consistent support for the targeting approach, despite dramatic differences in farmers' views of land stewardship, in their views about disproportionality of water quality impacts, and in their trust in conservation programming. While the theoretical concept of targeting was palatable to all participants, many raised concerns about its practical implementation, pointing to the need for flexibility when applying targeting solutions and revealing misgivings about the government agencies that perform targeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25073766     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0342-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Using wetlands for water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds; the importance of a watershed scale approach.

Authors:  W G Crumpton
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties.

Authors:  P A Matson; W J Parton; A G Power; M J Swift
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ecology. Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus.

Authors:  Daniel J Conley; Hans W Paerl; Robert W Howarth; Donald F Boesch; Sybil P Seitzinger; Karl E Havens; Christiane Lancelot; Gene E Likens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction I: a geographical allocation framework.

Authors:  Matthew W Diebel; Jeffrey T Maxted; Peter J Nowak; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction III: assessing phosphorus and sediment reduction potential.

Authors:  Matthew W Diebel; Jeffrey T Maxted; Dale M Robertson; Seungbong Han; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control.

Authors:  Chetan Maringanti; Indrajeet Chaubey; Mazdak Arabi; Bernard Engel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.266

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Farmers' Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Tingting Liu; Randall J F Bruins; Matthew T Heberling
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.251

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.