Literature DB >> 21664912

The ubiquitin- and SUMO-dependent signaling response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Simon Bekker-Jensen1, Niels Mailand.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represent the most destructive type of chromosomal lesion and trigger rapid chromatin restructuring accompanied by accumulation of proteins in the vicinity of the DSB. Non-proteolytic ubiquitylation of chromatin surrounding DSBs, mediated by the RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligase cascade, has emerged as a key mechanism for restoration of genome integrity by licensing the DSB-modified chromatin to concentrate genome caretaker proteins such as 53BP1 and BRCA1 near the lesions. In parallel, SUMOylation of upstream DSB regulators is also required for execution of this ubiquitin-dependent chromatin response, but its molecular basis is currently unclear. Here, we discuss recent insights into how ubiquitin- and SUMO-dependent signaling processes cooperate to orchestrate protein interactions with sites of DNA damage to facilitate DSB repair.
Copyright © 2011 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664912     DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


  64 in total

Review 1.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Rap80 protein recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks requires binding to both small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) and ubiquitin conjugates.

Authors:  Xin Hu; Atanu Paul; Bin Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions.

Authors:  Minghua Nie; Aaron Aslanian; John Prudden; Johanna Heideker; Ajay A Vashisht; James A Wohlschlegel; John R Yates; Michael N Boddy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Nico P Dantuma; Haico van Attikum
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Chromatin dynamics in DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Philipp Oberdoerffer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-01-17

6.  To trim or not to trim: progression and control of DSB end resection.

Authors:  Magda Granata; Davide Panigada; Elena Galati; Federico Lazzaro; Achille Pellicioli; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Ubiquitin-specific protease 26 (USP26) is not essential for mouse gametogenesis and fertility.

Authors:  Natalia Felipe-Medina; Laura Gómez-H; Yazmine B Condezo; Manuel Sanchez-Martín; José Luis Barbero; Isabel Ramos; Elena Llano; Alberto M Pendás
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Role of RNF4 in the ubiquitination of Rta of Epstein-Barr virus.

Authors:  Ya-Chun Yang; Yushi Yoshikai; Shih-Wei Hsu; Hisato Saitoh; Li-Kwan Chang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Acetylation dynamics of human nuclear proteins during the ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage response.

Authors:  Martin V Bennetzen; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Christoffel Dinant; Sugiko Watanabe; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Jens S Andersen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 10.  DNA damage, chromatin, and transcription: the trinity of aging.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Tom Misteli; Philipp Oberdoerffer
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.