Literature DB >> 23708517

To trim or not to trim: progression and control of DSB end resection.

Magda Granata1, Davide Panigada, Elena Galati, Federico Lazzaro, Achille Pellicioli, Paolo Plevani, Marco Muzi-Falconi.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic form of DNA damage, since they can lead to genome instability and chromosome rearrangements, which are hallmarks of cancer cells. To face this kind of lesion, eukaryotic cells developed two alternative repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Repair pathway choice is influenced by the cell cycle phase and depends upon the 5'-3' nucleolytic processing of the break ends, since the generation of ssDNA tails strongly stimulates HR and inhibits NHEJ. A large amount of work has elucidated the key components of the DSBs repair machinery and how this crucial process is finely regulated. The emerging view suggests that besides endo/exonucleases and helicases activities required for end resection, molecular barrier factors are specifically loaded in the proximity of the break, where they physically or functionally limit DNA degradation, preventing excessive accumulation of ssDNA, which could be threatening for cell survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; chromatin; double-strand breaks; homologous recombination; non-homologous end joining; nucleases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708517      PMCID: PMC3735699          DOI: 10.4161/cc.25042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  153 in total

1.  RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin.

Authors:  Eun Yong Shim; Soo Jin Hong; Ji-Hyun Oum; Yvonne Yanez; Yu Zhang; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection.

Authors:  Alessandro A Sartori; Claudia Lukas; Julia Coates; Martin Mistrik; Shuang Fu; Jiri Bartek; Richard Baer; Jiri Lukas; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus.

Authors:  Nicholas A Kent; Anna L Chambers; Jessica A Downs
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  The cell division cycle puts up with unprotected telomeres: cell cycle regulated telomere uncapping as a means to achieve telomere homeostasis.

Authors:  Momchil D Vodenicharov; Raymund J Wellinger
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Haico van Attikum; Olivier Fritsch; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex functions in sister chromatid cohesion.

Authors:  Hideaki Ogiwara; Takemi Enomoto; Masayuki Seki
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Exonuclease-1 deletion impairs DNA damage signaling and prolongs lifespan of telomere-dysfunctional mice.

Authors:  Sonja Schaetzlein; N R Kodandaramireddy; Zhenyu Ju; Andre Lechel; Anna Stepczynska; Dana R Lilli; Alan B Clark; Cornelia Rudolph; Florian Kuhnel; Kaichun Wei; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Peter Schirmacher; Thomas A Kunkel; Roger A Greenberg; Winfried Edelmann; K Lenhard Rudolph
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Bing Liang; Jiajing Qiu; Kajan Ratnakumar; Brehon C Laurent
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Melissa L Hefferin; Ling Chen; Eun Yong Shim; Hui-Min Tseng; Youngho Kwon; Patrick Sung; Sang Eun Lee; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  Andrew Hammet; Christine Magill; Jörg Heierhorst; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 8.807

View more
  6 in total

1.  A blooming resolvase at chromosomal fragile sites.

Authors:  Achille Pellicioli; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Recombinational repair of radiation-induced double-strand breaks occurs in the absence of extensive resection.

Authors:  James W Westmoreland; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Functional interplay between the 53BP1-ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 complex regulates resection, end-tethering and repair of a double-strand break.

Authors:  Matteo Ferrari; Diego Dibitetto; Giuseppe De Gregorio; Vinay V Eapen; Chetan C Rawal; Federico Lazzaro; Michael Tsabar; Federica Marini; James E Haber; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 4.  The Retinoblastoma (RB) Tumor Suppressor: Pushing Back against Genome Instability on Multiple Fronts.

Authors:  Renier Vélez-Cruz; David G Johnson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Tumor suppressor p53 cross-talks with TRIM family proteins.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Cen Zhang; Xue Wang; Wenwei Hu; Zhaohui Feng
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2020-07-16

6.  Slx4 and Rtt107 control checkpoint signalling and DNA resection at double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Diego Dibitetto; Matteo Ferrari; Chetan C Rawal; Attila Balint; TaeHyung Kim; Zhaolei Zhang; Marcus B Smolka; Grant W Brown; Federica Marini; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.