Literature DB >> 21660458

Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.

Thomas Zweig1, Emin Aghayev, Markus Melloh, Daniel Dietrich, Christoph Röder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, many pre-conditions are regarded as relative or absolute contraindications for lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). Radiculopathy is one among them. In Switzerland it is left to the surgeon's discretion when to operate if he adheres to a list of pre-defined indications. Contraindications, however, are less clearly specified. We hypothesized that, the extent of pre-operative radiculopathy results in different benefits for patients treated with mono-segmental lumbar TDR. We used patient perceived leg pain and its correlation with physician recorded radiculopathy for creating the patient groups to be compared.
METHODS: The present study is based on the dataset of SWISSspine, a government mandated health technology assessment registry. Between March 2005 and April 2009, 577 patients underwent either mono- or bi-segmental lumbar TDR, which was documented in a prospective observational multicenter mode. A total of 416 cases with a mono-segmental procedure were included in the study. The data collection consisted of pre-operative and follow-up data (physician based) and clinical outcomes (NASS form, EQ-5D). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted with patients' self-indicated leg pain and the surgeon-based diagnosis "radiculopathy", as marked on the case report forms. As a result, patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of leg pain. The two groups were compared with regard to the pre-operative patient characteristics and pre- and post-operative pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and quality of life using general linear modeling.
RESULTS: The optimal ROC model revealed a leg pain threshold of 40 ≤ VAS > 40 for the absence or the presence of "radiculopathy". Demographics in the resulting two groups were well comparable. Applying this threshold, the mean pre-operative leg pain level was 16.5 points in group 1 and 68.1 points in group 2 (p < 0.001). Back pain levels differed less with 63.6 points in group 1 and 72.6 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Pre-operative quality of life showed considerable differences with an 0.44 EQ-5D score in group 1 and 0.29 in group 2 (p < 0.001, possible score range -0.6 to 1). At a mean follow-up time of 8 months, group 1 showed a mean leg pain improvement of 3.6 points and group 2 of 41.1 points (p < 0.001). Back pain relief was 35.6 and 39.1 points, respectively (p = 0.27). EQ-5D score improvement was 0.27 in group 1 and 0.41 in group 2 (p = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients labeled as having radiculopathy (group 2) do mostly have pre-operative leg pain levels ≥ 40. Applying this threshold, the patients with pre-operative leg pain do also have more severe back pain and a considerably lower quality of life. Their net benefit from the lumbar TDR is higher and they do have similar post-operative back and leg pain levels as well as the quality of life as patients without pre-operative leg pain. Although randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings, they put leg pain and radiculopathy into perspective as absolute contraindications for TDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21660458      PMCID: PMC3535221          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1863-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

Review 1.  AcroFlex design and results.

Authors:  Robert D Fraser; E Raymond Ross; Gary L Lowery; Brian J Freeman; Mark Dolan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Point of view: Commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years.

Authors:  G Cinotti; T David; F Postacchini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm?

Authors:  Harold L Asch; P Jeffrey Lewis; Douglas B Moreland; James G Egnatchik; Young J Yu; David E Clabeaux; Andrew H Hyland
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States.

Authors:  Stephen H Hochschuler; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Richard D Guyer; Scott L Blumenthal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Sciatica.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Valat; Stéphane Genevay; Marc Marty; Sylvie Rozenberg; Bart Koes
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

7.  Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.

Authors:  Fred H Geisler; Scott L Blumenthal; Richard D Guyer; Paul C McAfee; John J Regan; J Patrick Johnson; Bradford Mullin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-09

8.  Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion.

Authors:  Jack E Zigler; Timothy A Burd; Emiliano N Vialle; Barton L Sachs; Ralph F Rashbaum; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

9.  Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc.

Authors:  André van Ooij; F Cumhur Oner; Ab J Verbout
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

Review 10.  The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Positive Outcomes of Varicose Vein Surgery: The Patient Perspective.

Authors:  Wei-Han Cheng; Haridarshan Patel; Wan-Ju Lee; Fang-Ju Lin; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Spinal motion preservation surgery: indications and applications.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Dimitrios V Papadopoulos; Dionysios K Giannoulis; Andreas G Tsantes; Anastasios V Korompilias
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-06

4.  Maverick total disc replacement in a real-world patient population: a prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Authors:  Richard Assaker; Karsten Ritter-Lang; Dominique Vardon; Stéphane Litrico; Stéphane Fuentes; Michael Putzier; Jörg Franke; Peter Jarzem; Pierre Guigui; Gérard Nakach; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Christian Etter; Christian Bärlocher; Friedrich Sgier; Philippe Otten; Paul Heini; Oliver Hausmann; Gianluca Maestretti; Martin Baur; François Porchet; Thomas M Markwalder; Stefan Schären; Michal Neukamp; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Indications for lumbar total disc replacement: selecting the right patient with the right indication for the right total disc.

Authors:  Karin Büttner-Janz; Richard D Guyer; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 9.  Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil R Nayak; James H Stephen; Matthew A Piazza; Adetokunbo A Obayemi; Sherman C Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-29

10.  Comparing Utility Scores in Common Spinal Radiculopathies: Results of a Prospective Valuation Study.

Authors:  Nikhil R Nayak; James H Stephen; Kalil G Abdullah; Sherman C Stein; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.