Literature DB >> 15541664

The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement.

Paul C McAfee1.   

Abstract

Although cervical and lumbar disc replacements are in their spinal surgical infancy with regard to clinical application, the indications are already delineated. Lumbar disc arthroplasty is indicated for one- or two-level discogenic mechanical back pain primarily in the absence of radiculopathy. In contrast, cervical disc replacement can be readily applied in patients presenting with neurologic deficit, radiculopathy or myelopathy because the approach and anterior spinal cord decompression are identical for anterior cervical disc replacement and traditional Smith-Robinson cervical decompression. In addition, the application of more complex spinal osteotomies, revision of pseudarthroses and deformity correction are much more applicable to the cervical arthroplasty procedures. This is because even the most experienced vascular access surgeon has difficulty with the formidable revision through a repeat anterior lumbar procedure, whereas most experienced cervical spinal surgeons are familiar with repeat anterior cervical approaches. The end result is that surgeons will have more trepidation with multilevel lumbar arthroplasties, especially those presenting in conjunction with neurologic symptoms. At the current time radiculopathy is an exclusion criteria for the four prospective Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) studies on lumbar disc replacement, whereas cervical radiculopathy is an inclusion criteria for the major IDE FDA investigations of cervical arthroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541664     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Cervical disc prostheses].

Authors:  E W Fritsch; T Pitzen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Focal hypermobility observed in cervical arthroplasty with Mobi-C.

Authors:  Jack William Kerferd; David Abi-Hanna; Kevin Phan; Prashanth Rao; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

5.  Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.

Authors:  Thomas Zweig; Emin Aghayev; Markus Melloh; Daniel Dietrich; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Influence of preoperative nucleus pulposus status and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry.

Authors:  Thomas Zweig; Christoph Hemmeler; Emin Aghayev; Markus Melloh; Christian Etter; Christoph Röder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-04-01

8.  Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Christian Hellum; Øivind Gjertsen; Gesche Neckelmann; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Geir Egil Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques?

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Roberto Assietti; Leonardo Corbino; Giuseppe Olindo; Pietro V Foti; Vittorio Russo; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 2: distraction and posterior translation lead to clinical failure after a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Eike K Hoff; Marc Schürings; Hendrik Schmidt; Marcel Dreischarf; Antonius Rohlmann; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.