Literature DB >> 21659638

Prehospital notification by emergency medical services reduces delays in stroke evaluation: findings from the North Carolina stroke care collaborative.

Mehul D Patel1, Kathryn M Rose, Emily C O'Brien, Wayne D Rosamond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Individuals with stroke-like symptoms are recommended to receive rapid diagnostic evaluation. Emergency medical services (EMS) transport, compared with private modes, and hospital notification before arrival may reduce delays in evaluation. This study estimated associations between hospital arrival modes (EMS or private and with or without EMS prenotification) and times for completion and interpretation of initial brain imaging in patients with presumed stroke.
METHODS: Among patients with suspected stroke identified and enrolled by the North Carolina Stroke Care Collaborative registry in 2008 to 2009, we analyzed data on arrival modes, meeting recommended targets for brain imaging completion and interpretation times (<25 minutes and <45 minutes since hospital arrival, respectively) and patient- and hospital-level characteristics. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted risk ratios and 95% CIs.
RESULTS: Of 13 894 eligible patients, 21% had their brain imaging completed and 23% had their brain imaging interpreted by a physician within target times. Arrival by EMS (versus private transport) was associated with both brain imaging completed within 25 minutes of arrival (EMS with prenotification: risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.1; EMS without prenotification: risk ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3) and brain imaging interpreted within 45 minutes (EMS with prenotification: risk ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.3; EMS without prenotification: risk ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with presumed stroke arriving to the hospital by EMS were more likely to receive brain imaging and have it interpreted by a physician in a timely manner than those arriving by private transport. Moreover, EMS arrivals with hospital prenotification experienced the most rapid evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21659638      PMCID: PMC3970287          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of emergency medical services times for stroke and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K R Evenson; E B Schroeder; T B Legare; J H Brice; W D Rosamond; D L Morris
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS).

Authors:  C S Kidwell; S Starkman; M Eckstein; K Weems; J L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Cuyahoga County Operation Stroke speed of emergency department evaluation and compliance with National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke time targets.

Authors:  Irene L Katzan; Thomas M Graber; Anthony J Furlan; Sophia Sundararajan; Cathy A Sila; Gary Houser; Dennis M Landis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Delay in presentation and evaluation for acute stroke: Stroke Time Registry for Outcomes Knowledge and Epidemiology (S.T.R.O.K.E.).

Authors:  C R Lacy; D C Suh; M Bueno; J B Kostis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Early stroke treatment associated with better outcome: the NINDS rt-PA stroke study.

Authors:  J R Marler; B C Tilley; M Lu; T G Brott; P C Lyden; J C Grotta; J P Broderick; S R Levine; M P Frankel; S H Horowitz; E C Haley; C A Lewandowski; T P Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Determinants of use of emergency medical services in a population with stroke symptoms: the Second Delay in Accessing Stroke Healthcare (DASH II) Study.

Authors:  E B Schroeder; W D Rosamond; D L Morris; K R Evenson; A R Hinn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Prehospital and emergency department delays after acute stroke: the Genentech Stroke Presentation Survey.

Authors:  D L Morris; W Rosamond; K Madden; C Schultz; S Hamilton
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  A multicentre observational study of presentation and early assessment of acute stroke.

Authors:  Farzaneh Harraf; Anil K Sharma; Martin M Brown; Kennedy R Lees; Richard I Vass; Lalit Kalra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-06

9.  Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry Surveillance - four states, 2005-2007.

Authors:  Mary G George; Xin Tong; Henraya McGruder; Paula Yoon; Wayne Rosamond; Andrea Winquist; Judith Hinchey; Hilary K Wall; Dilip K Pandey
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2009-11-06

Review 10.  A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care.

Authors:  K R Evenson; R E Foraker; D L Morris; W D Rosamond
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.266

View more
  38 in total

1.  Mobile Telestroke During Ambulance Transport Is Feasible in a Rural EMS Setting: The iTREAT Study.

Authors:  Jason M Lippman; Sherita N Chapman Smith; Timothy L McMurry; Zachary G Sutton; Brian S Gunnell; Jack Cote; Debra G Perina; David C Cattell-Gordon; Karen S Rheuban; Nina J Solenski; Bradford B Worrall; Andrew M Southerland
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Access to hyperacute stroke services across Canadian provinces: a geospatial analysis.

Authors:  Prasanna Venkatesan Eswaradass; Richard H Swartz; Jamey Rosen; Michael D Hill; M Patrice Lindsay
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-06-14

3.  The organisation of the acute ischemic stroke management: key notes of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Stroke Organization.

Authors:  E Agostoni; A Carolei; G Micieli; L Provinciali; D Toni; Simone Vidale
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Race and sex disparities in prehospital recognition of acute stroke.

Authors:  Prasanthi Govindarajan; Benjamin T Friedman; James Q Delgadillo; David Ghilarducci; Lawrence J Cook; Barbara Grimes; Charles E McCulloch; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  The White Whale.

Authors:  Kori S Zachrison; Joshua N Goldstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Hyperacute management of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Sarah Song
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.420

7.  Intra-hospital delays in stroke patients treated with rt-PA: impact of preadmission notification.

Authors:  Barbara Casolla; Marie Bodenant; Marie Girot; Charlotte Cordonnier; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Eric Wiel; Didier Leys; Patrick Goldstein
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Does Emergency Medical Services Transportation Mitigate Post-stroke Discharge Disability? A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Yuqi Wu; Khosrow Heidari; Jiera Zhou; Meng-Han Tsai; James W Hardin; Robert Wronski; Dana Hurley; Edward C Jauch; Souvik Sen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Review of stroke center effectiveness and other get with the guidelines data.

Authors:  Gisele Sampaio Silva; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Patient awareness and perception of stroke symptoms and the use of 911.

Authors:  Angela M Malek; Robert J Adams; Ellen Debenham; Andrea D Boan; Abby S Kazley; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Jenifer H Voeks; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.