Jason M Lippman1, Sherita N Chapman Smith2, Timothy L McMurry3, Zachary G Sutton4, Brian S Gunnell5, Jack Cote1, Debra G Perina6, David C Cattell-Gordon5, Karen S Rheuban5, Nina J Solenski1, Bradford B Worrall1,3, Andrew M Southerland1,3. 1. 1 Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, Virginia. 2. 2 Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System , Richmond, Virginia. 3. 3 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, Virginia. 4. 4 The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University , Greenville, North Carolina. 5. 5 Department of Center for Telehealth, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, Virginia. 6. 6 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health System , Charlottesville, Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine in the diagnosis and treatment of acute stroke, or telestroke, is a well-accepted method of practice improving geographic disparities in timely access to neurological expertise. We propose that mobile telestroke assessment during ambulance transport is feasible using low-cost, widely available technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a platform including a tablet-based end point, high-speed modem with commercial wireless access, external antennae, and portable mounting apparatus. Mobile connectivity testing was performed along six primary ambulance routes in a rural network. Audiovisual (AV) quality was assessed simultaneously by both an in-vehicle and an in-hospital rater using a standardized 6-point rating scale (≥4 indicating feasibility). We sought to achieve 9 min of continuous AV connectivity presumed sufficient to perform mobile telestroke assessments. RESULTS: Thirty test runs were completed: 93% achieved a minimum of 9 min of continuous video transmission with a mean mobile connectivity time of 18 min. Mean video and audio quality ratings were 4.51 (4.54 vehicle; 4.48 hospital) and 5.00 (5.13 in-vehicle; 4.87 hospital), respectively. Total initial cost of the system was $1,650 per ambulance. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, single-centered study we maintained high-quality continuous video transmission along primary ambulance corridors using a low-cost mobile telemedicine platform. The system is designed to be portable and adaptable, with generalizability for rapid assessment of emergency conditions in which direct observational exam may improve prehospital diagnosis and treatment. Thus mobile telestroke assessment is feasible using low-cost components and commercial wireless connectivity. More research is needed to demonstrate clinical reliability and efficacy in a live-patient setting.
BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine in the diagnosis and treatment of acute stroke, or telestroke, is a well-accepted method of practice improving geographic disparities in timely access to neurological expertise. We propose that mobile telestroke assessment during ambulance transport is feasible using low-cost, widely available technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a platform including a tablet-based end point, high-speed modem with commercial wireless access, external antennae, and portable mounting apparatus. Mobile connectivity testing was performed along six primary ambulance routes in a rural network. Audiovisual (AV) quality was assessed simultaneously by both an in-vehicle and an in-hospital rater using a standardized 6-point rating scale (≥4 indicating feasibility). We sought to achieve 9 min of continuous AV connectivity presumed sufficient to perform mobile telestroke assessments. RESULTS: Thirty test runs were completed: 93% achieved a minimum of 9 min of continuous video transmission with a mean mobile connectivity time of 18 min. Mean video and audio quality ratings were 4.51 (4.54 vehicle; 4.48 hospital) and 5.00 (5.13 in-vehicle; 4.87 hospital), respectively. Total initial cost of the system was $1,650 per ambulance. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, single-centered study we maintained high-quality continuous video transmission along primary ambulance corridors using a low-cost mobile telemedicine platform. The system is designed to be portable and adaptable, with generalizability for rapid assessment of emergency conditions in which direct observational exam may improve prehospital diagnosis and treatment. Thus mobile telestroke assessment is feasible using low-cost components and commercial wireless connectivity. More research is needed to demonstrate clinical reliability and efficacy in a live-patient setting.
Entities:
Keywords:
acute stroke; emergency medical services; mobile health; telemedicine; telestroke
Authors: Thomas G Liman; Benjamin Winter; Carolin Waldschmidt; Norman Zerbe; Peter Hufnagl; Heinrich J Audebert; Matthias Endres Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Marian P LaMonte; Yan Xiao; Peter F Hu; David M Gagliano; Mona N Bahouth; Ruwani D Gunawardane; Colin F MacKenzie; Wade R Gaasch; James Cullen Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: William J Powers; Colin P Derdeyn; José Biller; Christopher S Coffey; Brian L Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; S Claiborne Johnston; Alexander A Khalessi; Chelsea S Kidwell; James F Meschia; Bruce Ovbiagele; Dileep R Yavagal Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 10.170
Authors: Melissa S Eng; Anand V Patel; Richard B Libman; Paul Wright; Jeffrey M Katz Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Sherita N Chapman Smith; Prasanthi Govindarajan; Matthew M Padrick; Jason M Lippman; Timothy L McMurry; Brian L Resler; Kevin Keenan; Brian S Gunnell; Prachi Mehndiratta; Christina Y Chee; Elizabeth A Cahill; Cameron Dietiker; David C Cattell-Gordon; Wade S Smith; Debra G Perina; Nina J Solenski; Bradford B Worrall; Andrew M Southerland Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sherita N Chapman Smith; Pamela C Brown; Kaitlynne H Waits; Jason S Wong; Muhammad S Bhatti; Qaiser Toqeer; Jamie V Ricks; Michelle L Stockner; Tsion Habtamu; Joshnamaithili Seelam; Rashon C Britt; Jacob M Giovia; Baaba K Blankson; Poanna Bennam; Mirinda A Gormley; Juan Lu; Joseph P Ornato Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Maren Ranhoff Hov; Erik Zakariassen; Thomas Lindner; Terje Nome; Kristi G Bache; Jo Røislien; Jostein Gleditsch; Volker Solyga; David Russell; Christian G Lund Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: A G Rudd; C Bladin; P Carli; D A De Silva; T S Field; E C Jauch; P Kudenchuk; M W Kurz; T Lærdal; Meh Ong; P Panagos; A Ranta; C Rutan; M R Sayre; L Schonau; S D Shin; D Waters; F Lippert Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2020-03-29 Impact factor: 5.266