Angela M Malek1, Robert J Adams2, Ellen Debenham2, Andrea D Boan2, Abby S Kazley3, Hyacinth I Hyacinth2, Jenifer H Voeks2, Daniel T Lackland2. 1. Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. Electronic address: malek@musc.edu. 2. Department of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 3. Department of Healthcare Leadership & Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Response to stroke symptoms and the use of 911 can vary by race/ethnicity. The quickness with which a patient responds to such symptoms has implications for the outcome and treatment. We sought to examine a sample of patients receiving a Remote Evaluation of Acute isCHemic stroke (REACH) telestroke consult in South Carolina regarding their awareness and perception of stroke symptoms related to the use of 911 and to assess possible racial/ethnic disparities. METHODS: As of September 2013, 2325 REACH telestroke consults were conducted in 13 centers throughout South Carolina. Telephone surveys assessing use of 911 were administered from March 2012-January 2013 among 197 patients receiving REACH consults. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with use of 911. RESULTS: Most participants (73%) were Caucasian (27% were African-American) and male (54%). The mean age was 66 ± 14.3 years. Factors associated with use of 911 included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores >4 (odds ratio [OR], 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63-11.25), unknown insurance which includes self-pay or not charged (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.15-7.28), and perception of stroke-like symptoms as an emergency (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.65-12.67). African-Americans were significantly more likely than Caucasians to call 911 (62% vs. 43%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: African-Americans used 911 at a significantly higher rate. Use of 911 may be related to access to transportation, lack of insurance, or proximity to the hospital although this information was not available. Interventions are needed to improve patient arrival times to telemedicine equipped emergency departments after stroke.
BACKGROUND: Response to stroke symptoms and the use of 911 can vary by race/ethnicity. The quickness with which a patient responds to such symptoms has implications for the outcome and treatment. We sought to examine a sample of patients receiving a Remote Evaluation of Acute isCHemic stroke (REACH) telestroke consult in South Carolina regarding their awareness and perception of stroke symptoms related to the use of 911 and to assess possible racial/ethnic disparities. METHODS: As of September 2013, 2325 REACH telestroke consults were conducted in 13 centers throughout South Carolina. Telephone surveys assessing use of 911 were administered from March 2012-January 2013 among 197 patients receiving REACH consults. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with use of 911. RESULTS: Most participants (73%) were Caucasian (27% were African-American) and male (54%). The mean age was 66 ± 14.3 years. Factors associated with use of 911 included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores >4 (odds ratio [OR], 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63-11.25), unknown insurance which includes self-pay or not charged (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.15-7.28), and perception of stroke-like symptoms as an emergency (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.65-12.67). African-Americans were significantly more likely than Caucasians to call 911 (62% vs. 43%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: African-Americans used 911 at a significantly higher rate. Use of 911 may be related to access to transportation, lack of insurance, or proximity to the hospital although this information was not available. Interventions are needed to improve patient arrival times to telemedicine equipped emergency departments after stroke.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: R J Goldberg; M Mooradd; J H Gurwitz; W J Rogers; W J French; H V Barron; J M Gore Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1998-08-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Opeolu Adeoye; Christopher Lindsell; Joseph Broderick; Kathy Alwell; Edward Jauch; Charles J Moomaw; Matthew L Flaherty; Arthur Pancioli; Brett Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: L K Newby; W R Rutsch; R M Califf; M L Simoons; P E Aylward; P W Armstrong; L H Woodlief; K L Lee; E J Topol; F Van de Werf Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Altaf Saadi; Angela Y Kim; Josephine A Menkin; Carmen A Carrillo; Carmen E Reyes; Catherine A Sarkisian Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 2.136