Literature DB >> 21657134

The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature.

Frederic Vandermoere1, Sandrine Blanchemanche, Andrea Bieberstein, Stephan Marette, Jutta Roosen.   

Abstract

In spite of great expectations about the potential of nanotechnology, this study shows that people are rather ambiguous and pessimistic about nanotechnology applications in the food domain. Our findings are drawn from a survey of public perceptions about nanotechnology food and nanotechnology food packaging (N = 752). Multinomial logistic regression analyses further reveal that knowledge about food risks and nanotechnology significantly influences people's views about nanotechnology food packaging. However, knowledge variables were unrelated to support for nanofood, suggesting that an increase in people's knowledge might not be sufficient to bridge the gap between the excitement some business leaders in the food sector have and the restraint of the public. Additionally, opposition to nanofood was not related to the use of heuristics but to trust in governmental agencies. Furthermore, the results indicate that public perceptions of nanoscience in the food domain significantly relate to views on science, technology, and nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21657134     DOI: 10.1177/0963662509350139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  7 in total

1.  Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Arnout R H Fischer; Ivo A van der Lans; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance.

Authors:  N Gupta; A R H Fischer; L J Frewer
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 0.917

3.  UVΑ pre-irradiation to P25 titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhanced its toxicity towards freshwater algae Scenedesmus obliquus.

Authors:  Barsha Roy; Hemamalini Chandrasekaran; Suresh Palamadai Krishnan; Natarajan Chandrasekaran; Amitava Mukherjee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology.

Authors:  J Besley
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2010-09-25

5.  Interactive survey of consumer awareness of nanotechnologies and nanoparticles in consumer products in South Korea.

Authors:  Yu-Ri Kim; Eun Jeong Lee; Sung Ha Park; Hyo Jin Kwon; Seong Soo A An; Sang Wook Son; Young Rok Seo; Jae-Eun Pie; Myoung Yoon; Ja Hei Kim; Meyoung-Kon Kim
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.

Authors:  Adam Capon; James Gillespie; Margaret Rolfe; Wayne Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.

Authors:  Sumran Ali; Muhammad Asim Nawaz; Muhammad Ghufran; Sumaira Nazar Hussain; Aljaifi Saddam Hussein Mohammed
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.