Literature DB >> 22460398

Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology.

J Besley1.   

Abstract

This review explores research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. It highlights a recurring emphasis on some researchers' expectations that there will be a meaningful relationship between awareness of nanotechnology and positive views about nanotechnology. The review, however, also notes that this emphasis is tacitly and explicitly rejected by a range of multivariate studies that emphasize the key roles of non-awareness variables, such as, trust, general views about science, and overall worldview. The review concludes with a discussion of likely future research directions, including the expectation that social scientists will continue to focus on nanotechnology as a unique opportunity to study how individuals assess risk in the context of relatively low levels of knowledge.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22460398      PMCID: PMC3167657          DOI: 10.3134/ehtj.10.164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J        ISSN: 1752-8550


  15 in total

1.  Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.

Authors:  Michael Siegrist; Carmen Keller; Hans Kastenholz; Silvia Frey; Arnim Wiek
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?

Authors:  Steven C Currall; Eden B King; Neal Lane; Juan Madera; Stacey Turner
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Scientists worry about some risks more than the public.

Authors:  Dietram A Scheufele; Elizabeth A Corley; Sharon Dunwoody; Tsung-Jen Shih; Elliott Hillback; David H Guston
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-11-25       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Risky business: perceived behavior of local scientists and community support for their research.

Authors:  Katherine A McComas; John C Besley; Zheng Yang
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Nanotechnology and society: the evolution of risk perceptions.

Authors:  Dan M Kahan
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature.

Authors:  Frederic Vandermoere; Sandrine Blanchemanche; Andrea Bieberstein; Stephan Marette; Jutta Roosen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2011-03

9.  Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Corley; Dietram A Scheufele; Qian Hu
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nick Pidgeon; Barbara Herr Harthorn; Karl Bryant; Tee Rogers-Hayden
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in nanotherapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury repair.

Authors:  Young Hye Song; Nikunj K Agrawal; Jonathan M Griffin; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 15.470

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.