Literature DB >> 22822302

Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis.

Nidhi Gupta, Arnout R H Fischer, Ivo A van der Lans, Lynn J Frewer.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology can be described as an emerging technology and, as has been the case with other emerging technologies such as genetic modification, different socio-psychological factors will potentially influence societal responses to its development and application. These factors will play an important role in how nanotechnology is developed and commercialised. This article aims to identify expert opinion on factors influencing societal response to applications of nanotechnology. Structured interviews with experts on nanotechnology from North West Europe were conducted using repertory grid methodology in conjunction with generalized Procrustes analysis to examine the psychological constructs underlying societal uptake of 15 key applications of nanotechnology drawn from different areas (e.g. medicine, agriculture and environment, chemical, food, military, sports, and cosmetics). Based on expert judgement, the main factors influencing societal response to different applications of nanotechnology will be the extent to which applications are perceived to be beneficial, useful, and necessary, and how 'real' and physically close to the end-user these applications are perceived to be by the public. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11051-012-0857-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22822302      PMCID: PMC3397131          DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0857-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nanopart Res        ISSN: 1388-0764            Impact factor:   2.253


  31 in total

1.  Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S.

Authors:  G Gaskell; M W Bauer; J Durant; N C Allum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Public concerns in the United Kingdom about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: risk, benefit, and ethics.

Authors:  Lynn J Frewer; Chaya Howard; Richard Shepherd
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  1997

3.  GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.

Authors:  George Gaskell; Nick Allum; Wolfgang Wagner; Nicole Kronberger; Helge Torgersen; Juergen Hampel; Julie Bardes
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Risk and benefit perceptions of mobile phone and base station technology in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Ellen van Kleef; Arnout R H Fischer; Moin Khan; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.

Authors:  Michael Siegrist; Nathalie Stampfli; Hans Kastenholz; Carmen Keller
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Assessing patients' preferences for treatments for angina using a modified repertory grid method.

Authors:  Gene Rowe; Nigel Lambert; Ann Bowling; Shah Ebrahim; Ian Wakeling; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Understanding consumer attitudes toward food technologies in Canada.

Authors:  Spencer Henson; Mamane Annou; John Cranfield; Joanne Ryks
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  An exploratory qualitative study to investigate how patients evaluate complementary and conventional medicine.

Authors:  G T Lewith; J Chan
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.446

9.  Identifying the values and preferences of prosthetic users: a case study series using the repertory grid technique.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schaffalitzky; Sinead NiMhurchadha; Pamela Gallagher; Susan Hofkamp; Malcolm MacLachlan; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nick Pidgeon; Barbara Herr Harthorn; Karl Bryant; Tee Rogers-Hayden
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  8 in total

1.  Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance.

Authors:  N Gupta; A R H Fischer; L J Frewer
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 0.917

2.  Comparative analysis of nanotechnology awareness in consumers and experts in South Korea.

Authors:  Yu-Ri Kim; Eun Jeong Lee; Sung Ha Park; Hyo Jin Kwon; Seong Soo A An; Sang Wook Son; Young Rok Seo; Jae-Eun Pie; Myoung Yoon; Ja Hei Kim; Meyoung-Kon Kim
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Interactive survey of consumer awareness of nanotechnologies and nanoparticles in consumer products in South Korea.

Authors:  Yu-Ri Kim; Eun Jeong Lee; Sung Ha Park; Hyo Jin Kwon; Seong Soo A An; Sang Wook Son; Young Rok Seo; Jae-Eun Pie; Myoung Yoon; Ja Hei Kim; Meyoung-Kon Kim
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-15

4.  Scientists' Understandings of Risk of Nanomaterials: Disciplinary Culture Through the Ethnographic Lens.

Authors:  Mikael Johansson; Åsa Boholm
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Road Traffic Injuries Prevention in Iran; A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Saber Azami-Aghdash; Hassan Abolghasem Gorji; Naser Derakhshani; Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2019-10

6.  Exploring the Potential of Emerging Technologies to Meet the Care and Support Needs of Older People: A Delphi Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Abdi; Luc de Witte; Mark Hawley
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-13

7.  Factors influencing consumption of traditional diets: stakeholder views regarding sago consumption among the indigenous peoples of West Papua.

Authors:  Fathir Fajar Sidiq; David Coles; Carmen Hubbard; Beth Clark; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  Agric Food Secur       Date:  2022-10-07

8.  Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Sharron Kuznesof; Beth Clark; Carmen Hubbard; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.253

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.