Literature DB >> 19748345

Probing the "dark matter" of protein fold space.

William R Taylor1, Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Siv Midtun Hollup, James T MacDonald, Inge Jonassen.   

Abstract

We used a protein structure prediction method to generate a variety of folds as alpha-carbon models with realistic secondary structures and good hydrophobic packing. The prediction method used only idealized constructs that are not based on known protein structures or fragments of them, producing an unbiased distribution. Model and native fold comparison used a topology-based method as superposition can only be relied on in similar structures. When all the models were compared to a nonredundant set of all known structures, only one-in-ten were found to have a match. This large excess of novel folds was associated with each protein probe and if true in general, implies that the space of possible folds is larger than the space of realized folds, in much the same way that sequence-space is larger than fold-space. The large excess of novel folds exhibited no unusual properties and has been likened to cosmological dark matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19748345     DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  32 in total

1.  Protein topology from predicted residue contacts.

Authors:  William R Taylor; David T Jones; Michael I Sadowski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Exploring the factors determining the dynamics of different protein folds.

Authors:  S M Hollup; E Fuglebakk; W R Taylor; N Reuter
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Unexpected features of the dark proteome.

Authors:  Nelson Perdigão; Julian Heinrich; Christian Stolte; Kenneth S Sabir; Michael J Buckley; Bruce Tabor; Beth Signal; Brian S Gloss; Christopher J Hammang; Burkhard Rost; Andrea Schafferhans; Seán I O'Donoghue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Hongyi Zhou; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Characterizing the existing and potential structural space of proteins by large-scale multiple loop permutations.

Authors:  Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Multistep mutational transformation of a protein fold through structural intermediates.

Authors:  Vlad K Kumirov; Emily M Dykstra; Branwen M Hall; William J Anderson; Taylor N Szyszka; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Design of coiled-coil protein-origami cages that self-assemble in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Ajasja Ljubetič; Fabio Lapenta; Helena Gradišar; Igor Drobnak; Jana Aupič; Žiga Strmšek; Duško Lainšček; Iva Hafner-Bratkovič; Andreja Majerle; Nuša Krivec; Mojca Benčina; Tomaž Pisanski; Tanja Ćirković Veličković; Adam Round; José María Carazo; Roberto Melero; Roman Jerala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

10.  De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design.

Authors:  James T MacDonald; Katarzyna Maksimiak; Michael I Sadowski; William R Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.