Literature DB >> 21651708

The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates.

Adam Sonfield1, Kathryn Kost, Rachel Benson Gold, Lawrence B Finer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Births resulting from unintended pregnancies are associated with substantial maternity and infant care costs to the federal and state governments; these costs have never been estimated at the national and state levels.
METHODS: The proportions of births paid for by public insurance programs in 2006 were estimated, by pregnancy intention status, using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System and similar state surveys, or were predicted by multivariate linear regression. Public costs were calculated using state-level estimates of the number of births, by intention status, and of the cost of a publicly funded birth.
RESULTS: In 2006, 64% of births resulting from unintended pregnancies were publicly funded, compared with 48% of all births and 35% of births resulting from intended pregnancies. The proportion of births resulting from unintended pregnancies that were publicly funded varied by state, from 42% to 81%. Of the 2.0 million publicly funded births, 51% resulted from unintended pregnancies, accounting for $11.1 billion in costs-half of the total public expenditures on births. In seven states, the costs for births from unintended pregnancies exceeded a half billion dollars.
CONCLUSIONS: Public insurance programs are central in assisting American families in affording pregnancy and childbirth; however, they pay for a disproportionately high number of births resulting from unintended pregnancy. The resulting budgetary impact warrants increased public efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy.
Copyright © 2011 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21651708     DOI: 10.1363/4309411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  53 in total

1.  Unintended birth among Hispanic women in Texas: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Denise Vasquez; Jill A McDonald; Nuria Homedes; Louis D Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-06

2.  Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Nikki Zite; Joseph E Potter; James Trussell; Kenneth Smith
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Changes in US health care provider attitudes related to contraceptive safety before and after the release of National Guidance.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Isabel A Morgan; Kathryn M Curtis; Suzanne G Folger; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The cost of unintended pregnancies for employer-sponsored health insurance plans.

Authors:  Gabriela Dieguez; Bruce S Pyenson; Amy W Law; Richard Lynen; James Trussell
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Measurement of sexual health in the U.S.: an inventory of nationally representative surveys and surveillance systems.

Authors:  Megan B Ivankovich; Jami S Leichliter; John M Douglas
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Katherine J Sapra; Rosalind B King; Jean Fredo Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Young women's contraceptive microbicide preferences: associations with contraceptive behavior and sexual relationship characteristics.

Authors:  Candace Best; Amanda E Tanner; Devon J Hensel; J Dennis Fortenberry; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-12-10

9.  Considerations for national public health leadership in advancing sexual health.

Authors:  Megan B Ivankovich; Kevin A Fenton; John M Douglas
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds.

Authors:  Suzanne Burlone; Alison B Edelman; Aaron B Caughey; James Trussell; Stella Dantas; Maria I Rodriguez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.