Literature DB >> 22840280

Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds.

Suzanne Burlone1, Alison B Edelman, Aaron B Caughey, James Trussell, Stella Dantas, Maria I Rodriguez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand health care coverage to low-income Americans. Contraception services are a mandated component of ACA plans. STUDY
DESIGN: A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the costs and outcomes of the current versus the proposed plan for contraceptive coverage (Federal Poverty Level=185% vs. 399%, respectively) over 5 years. The perspective adopted was that of Oregon state insurance providers. The primary outcomes were number of pregnancies averted, health costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Contraceptive failure rates, costs, projected insurance coverage, contraception use and pregnancy outcome data were obtained from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed for all variables.
RESULTS: Extending contraceptive coverage both saves money and improves outcomes for Oregon state insurance plan providers. The proposed policy would prevent an additional 72 pregnancies per 1000 women over 5 years. Extending coverage is cost-effective, saving an additional $489 per woman enrolled over 5 years while increasing QALYs.
CONCLUSIONS: Expanding contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Health Act is cost-effective for Oregon state insurance providers.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840280      PMCID: PMC5515367          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization.

Authors:  Grace Shih; David K Turok; Willie J Parker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Kathryn Kost
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-05-19

5.  Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Gorette Amaral; Claire Brindis; Sandy Navarro; Mary Bradsberry; Felicia Stewart
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-09

Review 6.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births.

Authors:  Richard C Lindrooth; Jeffrey S McCullough
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

8.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

9.  Measuring the effects of unintended pregnancy on women's quality of life.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Rachel Smith; Jody Steinauer; Matthew F Reeves; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Changes in prescription contraceptive use, 1995-2002: the effect of insurance status.

Authors:  Kelly R Culwell; Joe Feinglass
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  10 in total

1.  The cost of unintended pregnancies for employer-sponsored health insurance plans.

Authors:  Gabriela Dieguez; Bruce S Pyenson; Amy W Law; Richard Lynen; James Trussell
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-04

2.  Social disparities in women's health service use in the United States: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Vanessa Dalton; Timothy R B Johnson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Measuring health utility in varying pregnancy contexts among a diverse cohort of pregnant women.

Authors:  Lisbet S Lundsberg; Xiao Xu; Eleanor B Schwarz; Aileen M Gariepy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Abortion access and state variation in observed unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Stevenson; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Religiosity and the Transition to Nonmarital Parity.

Authors:  Heidi Ann Lyons; Scott James Smith
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2014-06-01

6.  Implications of employer coverage of contraception: Cost-effectiveness analysis of contraception coverage under an employer mandate.

Authors:  W Canestaro; E Vodicka; D Downing; J Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Cost-effectiveness of Increasing Access to Contraception during the Zika Virus Outbreak, Puerto Rico, 2016.

Authors:  Rui Li; Katharine B Simmons; Jeanne Bertolli; Brenda Rivera-Garcia; Shanna Cox; Lisa Romero; Lisa M Koonin; Miguel Valencia-Prado; Nabal Bracero; Denise J Jamieson; Wanda Barfield; Cynthia A Moore; Cara T Mai; Lauren C Korhonen; Meghan T Frey; Janice Perez-Padilla; Ricardo Torres-Muñoz; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Development of a pharmacoeconomic registry: an example using hormonal contraceptives.

Authors:  Annesha White; Meenakshi Srinivasan; La Marcus Wingate; Samuel Peasah; Marc Fleming
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-03-20

9.  Antiseizure medications and oral contraceptives: Impact of enzyme inducers on pregnancy outcomes and costs.

Authors:  Seri Anderson; Josephine Mauskopf; Sandra E Talbird; Annesha White; Meenakshi Srinivasan
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.937

10.  Evaluation of the challenges faced in increasing contraceptive access within a community college population.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lamme; Alison Edelman; Emily Padua; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2017-10-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.