Megan B Ivankovich1, Jami S Leichliter, John M Douglas. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify opportunities within nationally representative surveys and surveillance systems to measure indicators of sexual health, we reviewed and inventoried existing data systems that include variables relevant to sexual health. METHODS: We searched for U.S. nationally representative surveys and surveillance systems that provided individual-level sexual health data. We assessed the methods of each data system and catalogued them by their measurement of the following domains of sexual health: knowledge, communication, attitudes, service access and utilization, sexual behaviors, relationships, and adverse health outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 18 U.S.-focused, nationally representative data systems: six assessing the general population, seven focused on special populations, and five addressing health outcomes. While these data systems provide a rich repository of information from which to assess national measures of sexual health, they present several limitations. Most importantly, apart from data on service utilization, routinely gathered, national data are currently focused primarily on negative aspects of sexual health (e.g., risk behaviors and adverse health outcomes) rather than more positive attributes (e.g., healthy communication and attitudes, and relationship quality). CONCLUSION: Nationally representative data systems provide opportunities to measure a broad array of domains of sexual health. However, current measurement gaps indicate the need to modify existing surveys, where feasible and appropriate, and develop new tools to include additional indicators that address positive domains of sexual health of the U.S. population across the life span. Such data can inform the development of effective policy actions, services, prevention programs, and resource allocation to advance sexual health.
OBJECTIVES: To identify opportunities within nationally representative surveys and surveillance systems to measure indicators of sexual health, we reviewed and inventoried existing data systems that include variables relevant to sexual health. METHODS: We searched for U.S. nationally representative surveys and surveillance systems that provided individual-level sexual health data. We assessed the methods of each data system and catalogued them by their measurement of the following domains of sexual health: knowledge, communication, attitudes, service access and utilization, sexual behaviors, relationships, and adverse health outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 18 U.S.-focused, nationally representative data systems: six assessing the general population, seven focused on special populations, and five addressing health outcomes. While these data systems provide a rich repository of information from which to assess national measures of sexual health, they present several limitations. Most importantly, apart from data on service utilization, routinely gathered, national data are currently focused primarily on negative aspects of sexual health (e.g., risk behaviors and adverse health outcomes) rather than more positive attributes (e.g., healthy communication and attitudes, and relationship quality). CONCLUSION: Nationally representative data systems provide opportunities to measure a broad array of domains of sexual health. However, current measurement gaps indicate the need to modify existing surveys, where feasible and appropriate, and develop new tools to include additional indicators that address positive domains of sexual health of the U.S. population across the life span. Such data can inform the development of effective policy actions, services, prevention programs, and resource allocation to advance sexual health.
Authors: Cindy M Weinbaum; Ian Williams; Eric E Mast; Susan A Wang; Lyn Finelli; Annemarie Wasley; Stephanie M Neitzel; John W Ward Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2008-09-19
Authors: Lisa Smylie; Barbara Clarke; Maryanne Doherty; Jacqueline Gahagan; Matthew Numer; Joanne Otis; Greg Smith; Alexander McKay; Christine Soon Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Michael Reece; Debby Herbenick; Vanessa Schick; Stephanie A Sanders; Brian Dodge; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Sara E Forhan; Sami L Gottlieb; Maya R Sternberg; Fujie Xu; S Deblina Datta; Geraldine M McQuillan; Stuart M Berman; Lauri E Markowitz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lucia Guerra-Reyes; Benjamin Rush; Debby Herbenick; Brian Dodge; Michael Reece; Vanessa Schick; Stephanie A Sanders; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2017-10