Literature DB >> 21646218

Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb.

Carlos M Herrera1, Ricardo Pérez, Conchita Alonso.   

Abstract

Variation in nectar chemistry among plants, flowers, or individual nectaries of a given species has been only rarely explored, yet it is an essential aspect to our understanding of how pollinator-mediated selection might act on nectar traits. This paper describes variation in nectar sugar composition in a population of the perennial herb Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae) and dissects it into components due to variation among plants, flowers of the same plant, and nectaries of the same flower. The proportions of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in single-nectary nectar samples collected at two times in the flowering season were determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Sugar composition varied extensively among nectaries, and nearly all combinations of individual sugars were recorded. Population-wide variance was mainly accounted for by variation among flowers of the same plant (56% of total), nectaries of the same flower (30%), and only minimally by differences among plants (14%). In absolute terms, intraplant variation was similar to or greater than that ordinarily reported in interspecific comparisons. Results suggest that the prevailing notion of intraspecific constancy in nectar sugar composition may be unwarranted for some species and that more elaborate nectar sampling designs are required to detect and appropriately account for extensive within-plant variance. Within-plant variation in nectar sugar composition will limit the ability of pollinators to exert selection on nectar chemistry in H. foetidus and may be advantageous to plants by reducing the number of flowers visited per foraging bout by variance-sensitive, risk-averse pollinators.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 21646218     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.93.4.575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  26 in total

1.  How to cheat when you cannot lie? Deceit pollination in Begonia gracilis.

Authors:  Reyna A Castillo; Helga Caballero; Karina Boege; Juan Fornoni; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Intra-plant variation in nectar sugar composition in two Aquilegia species (Ranunculaceae): contrasting patterns under field and glasshouse conditions.

Authors:  Azucena Canto; Ricardo Pérez; Mónica Medrano; María Clara Castellanos; Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Measuring foraging preferences in bumble bees: a comparison of popular laboratory methods and a test for sucrose preferences following neonicotinoid exposure.

Authors:  Sarah K Richman; Felicity Muth; Anne S Leonard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Nectar production dynamics and sugar composition in two Mucuna species (Leguminosae, Faboideae) with different specialized pollinators.

Authors:  Kayna Agostini; Marlies Sazima; Leonardo Galetto
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-09-18

6.  Nectar yeasts warm the flowers of a winter-blooming plant.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; María I Pozo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Nectar supplementation changes pollinator behaviour and pollination mode in Pedicularis dichotoma: implications for evolutionary transitions.

Authors:  Ze-Yu Tong; Xiang-Ping Wang; Ling-Yun Wu; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Field methods for sampling and storing nectar from flowers with low nectar volumes.

Authors:  D S Morrant; R Schumann; S Petit
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  The mean and variability of a floral trait have opposing effects on fitness traits.

Authors:  Can Dai; Xijian Liang; Jie Ren; Minglin Liao; Jiyang Li; Laura F Galloway
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community.

Authors:  A Canto; C M Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.