Literature DB >> 17259227

Intra-plant variation in nectar sugar composition in two Aquilegia species (Ranunculaceae): contrasting patterns under field and glasshouse conditions.

Azucena Canto1, Ricardo Pérez, Mónica Medrano, María Clara Castellanos, Carlos M Herrera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intra-specific variation in nectar chemistry under natural conditions has been only rarely explored, yet it is an essential aspect of our understanding of how pollinator-mediated selection might act on nectar traits. This paper examines intra-specific variation in nectar sugar composition in field and glasshouse plants of the bumblebee-pollinated perennial herbs Aquilegia vulgaris subsp. vulgaris and Aquilegia pyrenaica subsp. cazorlensis (Ranunculaceae). The aims of the study are to assess the generality of extreme intra-plant variation in nectar sugar composition recently reported for other species in the field, and gaining insight on the possible mechanisms involved.
METHODS: The proportions of glucose, fructose and sucrose in single-nectary nectar samples collected from field and glasshouse plants were determined using high performance liquid chromatography. A hierarchical variance partition was used to dissect total variance into components due to variation among plants, flowers within plants, and nectaries within flowers. KEY
RESULTS: Nectar of the two species was mostly sucrose-dominated, but composition varied widely in the field, ranging from sucrose-only to fructose-dominated. Most intra-specific variance was due to differences among nectaries of the same flower, and flowers of the same plant. The high intra-plant variation in sugar composition exhibited by field plants vanished in the glasshouse, where nectar composition emerged as a remarkably constant feature across plants, flowers and nectaries.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to corroborating the results of previous studies documenting extreme intra-plant variation in nectar sugar composition in the field, this study suggests that such variation may ultimately be caused by biotic factors operating on the nectar in the field but not in the glasshouse. Pollinator visitation and pollinator-borne yeasts are suggested as likely causal agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259227      PMCID: PMC2802931          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  4 in total

1.  Temporal changes in floral nectar production, reabsorption, and composition associated with dichogamy in annual caraway (Carum carvi; Apiaceae).

Authors:  Michael W Langenberger; Arthur R Davis
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; Ricardo Pérez; Conchita Alonso
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  Ecology of yeasts in plant-bumblebee mutualism in Central Europe.

Authors:  Michael Brysch-Herzberg
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Nectar-carbohydrate production and composition vary in relation to nectary anatomy and location within individual flowers of several species of Brassicaceae.

Authors:  A R Davis; J D Pylatuik; J C Paradis; N H Low
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.116

  4 in total
  15 in total

1.  How to cheat when you cannot lie? Deceit pollination in Begonia gracilis.

Authors:  Reyna A Castillo; Helga Caballero; Karina Boege; Juan Fornoni; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Floral Metabolism of Sugars and Amino Acids: Implications for Pollinators' Preferences and Seed and Fruit Set.

Authors:  Monica Borghi; Alisdair R Fernie
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Nectar production dynamics and sugar composition in two Mucuna species (Leguminosae, Faboideae) with different specialized pollinators.

Authors:  Kayna Agostini; Marlies Sazima; Leonardo Galetto
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-09-18

5.  Contrasting effects of yeasts and bacteria on floral nectar traits.

Authors:  Rachel L Vannette; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Presence of yeasts in floral nectar is consistent with the hypothesis of microbial-mediated signaling in plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  María I Pozo; Clara de Vega; Azucena Canto; Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-11-19

7.  The mean and variability of a floral trait have opposing effects on fitness traits.

Authors:  Can Dai; Xijian Liang; Jie Ren; Minglin Liao; Jiyang Li; Laura F Galloway
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community.

Authors:  A Canto; C M Herrera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; Clara de Vega; Azucena Canto; María I Pozo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Nitrogen Assimilation Varies Among Clades of Nectar- and Insect-Associated Acinetobacters.

Authors:  Sergio Álvarez-Pérez; Kaoru Tsuji; Marion Donald; Ado Van Assche; Rachel L Vannette; Carlos M Herrera; Hans Jacquemyn; Tadashi Fukami; Bart Lievens
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.