Literature DB >> 29878060

Nectar supplementation changes pollinator behaviour and pollination mode in Pedicularis dichotoma: implications for evolutionary transitions.

Ze-Yu Tong1, Xiang-Ping Wang2, Ling-Yun Wu1, Shuang-Quan Huang1.   

Abstract

Backgrounds and Aims: Gain or loss of floral nectar, an innovation in floral traits, has occurred in diverse lineages of flowering plants, but the causes of reverse transitions (gain of nectar) remain unclear. Phylogenetic studies show multiple gains and losses of floral nectar in the species-rich genus Pedicularis. Here we explore how experimental addition of nectar to a supposedly nectarless species, P. dichotoma, influences pollinator foraging behaviour.
Methods: The liquid (nectar) at the base of the corolla tube in P. dichotoma was investigated during anthesis. Sugar components were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. To understand evolutionary transitions of nectar, artificial nectar was added to corolla tubes and the reactions of bumble-bee pollinators to extra nectar were examined. Key
Results: A quarter of unmanipulated P. dichotoma plants contained measurable nectar, with 0.01-0.49 μL per flower and sugar concentrations ranging from 4 to 39 %. The liquid surrounding the ovaries in the corolla tubes was sucrose-dominant nectar, as in two sympatric nectariferous Pedicularis species. Bumble-bees collected only pollen from control (unmanipulated) flowers of P. dichotoma, adopting a sternotribic pollination mode, but switched to foraging for nectar in manipulated (nectar-supplemented) flowers, adopting a nototribic pollination mode as in nectariferous species. This altered foraging behaviour did not place pollen on the ventral side of the bees, and sternotribic pollination also decreased.
Conclusion: Our study is the first to quantify variation in nectar production in a supposedly 'nectarless' Pedicularis species. Flower manipulations by adding nectar suggested that gain (or loss) of nectar would quickly result in an adaptive behavioural shift in the pollinator, producing a new location for pollen deposition and stigma contact without a shift to other pollinators. Frequent gains of nectar in Pedicularis species would be beneficial by enhancing pollinator attraction in unpredictable pollination environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29878060      PMCID: PMC6344217          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  30 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic evidence for pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms.

Authors:  Timotheüs van der Niet; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Resource partitioning among flower visitors and evolution of nectar concealment in multi-species communities.

Authors:  Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés; Luis Santamaría
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  What's the 'buzz' about? The ecology and evolutionary significance of buzz-pollination.

Authors:  Paul A De Luca; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae.

Authors:  M R Neiland; C C Wilcock
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Floral nectary, nectar production dynamics, and floral reproductive isolation among closely related species of Pedicularis.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Liu; Yan Li; Fu-Sheng Yang; Xiao-Quan Wang
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 7.061

6.  Safe sites of pollen placement: a conflict of interest between plants and bees?

Authors:  Ze-Yu Tong; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Shared pollinators and pollen transfer dynamics in two hybridizing species, Rhinanthus minor and R. angustifolius.

Authors:  Laurent C Natalis; Renate A Wesselingh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Darwin's second 'abominable mystery': Why are there so many angiosperm species?

Authors:  William L Crepet; Karl J Niklas
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Craig I Peter; Jon Agren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of the large temperate genus Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae), with an emphasis on species from the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains.

Authors:  Wen-Bin Yu; Min-Lu Liu; Hong Wang; Robert R Mill; Richard H Ree; Jun-Bo Yang; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transmission of bee-like vibrations in buzz-pollinated plants with different stamen architectures.

Authors:  Lucy Nevard; Avery L Russell; Karl Foord; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Anther cones increase pollen release in buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers.

Authors:  Mario Vallejo-Marín; Carlos Eduardo Pereira Nunes; Avery Leigh Russell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.171

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.