Literature DB >> 21643455

The Independent Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Lexical Acquisition by Preschool Children.

Holly L Storkel1, Su-Yeon Lee.   

Abstract

The goal of this research was to disentangle effects of phonotactic probability, the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence, and neighborhood density, the number of phonologically similar words, in lexical acquisition. Two word learning experiments were conducted with 4-year-old children. Experiment 1 manipulated phonotactic probability while holding neighborhood density and referent characteristics constant. Experiment 2 manipulated neighborhood density while holding phonotactic probability and referent characteristics constant. Learning was tested at two time points (immediate vs. retention) in both a naming and referent identification task, although only data from the referent identification task were analyzed due to poor performance in the naming task. Results showed that children were more accurate learning rare sound sequences than common sound sequences and this was consistent across time points. In contrast, the effect of neighborhood density varied by time. Children were more accurate learning sparse sound sequences than dense sound sequences at the immediate test point but accuracy for dense sound sequences significantly improved by the retention test without further training. It was hypothesized that phonotactic probability and neighborhood density influenced different cognitive processes that underlie lexical acquisition.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643455      PMCID: PMC3106994          DOI: 10.1080/01690961003787609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  36 in total

1.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

3.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Melinda Hinton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

Authors:  A B Smit; L Hand; J J Freilinger; J E Bernthal; A Bird
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-11

5.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

6.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Junko Maekawa
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2005-11

9.  Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects.

Authors:  Jakke Tamminen; M Gareth Gaskell
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  43 in total

1.  Impacts of Visual Sonority and Handshape Markedness on Second Language Learning of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Joshua T Williams; Sharlene D Newman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-06

2.  Lexical characteristics of expressive vocabulary in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sara T Kover; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Online learning from input versus offline memory evolution in adult word learning: effects of neighborhood density and phonologically related practice.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Daniel E Bontempo; Natalie S Pak
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.

Authors:  Shelley Gray; Andrea Pittman; Juliet Weinhold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Christina Meyers; Trianna Oglivie; Katrina Nicholas; Genesis Arizmendi
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  The effect of time on word learning: an examination of decay of the memory trace and vocal rehearsal in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Tammie Spaulding
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Operationalization of Sign Language Phonological Similarity and its Effects on Lexical Access.

Authors:  Joshua T Williams; Adam Stone; Sharlene D Newman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2017-07-01

8.  The influence of known-word-frequency on the acquisition of new neighbors in adults: evidence for exemplar representations in word-learning.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Holly L Storkel; Ana Clara Francisco; Katherine J Evans; Rutherford Goldstein
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Effects of Neighborhood Density on Adult Word Repetition.

Authors:  Skott E Freedman; Jessica A Barlow
Journal:  Int J Engl Linguist       Date:  2013-04-01

10.  Third person singular -s in typical development and specific language impairment: Input and neighbourhood density.

Authors:  Justin B Kueser; Laurence B Leonard; Patricia Deevy
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 1.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.