Literature DB >> 21637721

Effects of Phonotactic Probabilities on the Processing of Spoken Words and Nonwords by Adults with Cochlear Implants Who Were Postlingually Deafened.

Michael S Vitevitch1, David B Pisoni, Karen Iler Kirk, Marcia Hay-McCutcheon, Stacey L Yount.   

Abstract

Probabilistic phonotactics refers to the frequency with which segments and sequences of segments occur in syllables and words. Knowledge of phonotactics has been shown to be an important source of information in recognizing spoken words in listeners with normal hearing. Two online tasks (an auditory same-different task and an auditory lexical decision task) were used to examine the use of phonotactic information by adults who were postlingually deafened who have received cochlear implants. The results of the experiments showed that cochlear implant patients with better word recognition abilities (as measured by the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU-6) produced patterns of results that were similar to the pattern of results obtained from listeners with normal hearing in Vitevitch and Luce (1999). This finding suggests that cochlear implant patients with better word recognition abilities use lexical and sublexical representations to process spoken words, much like listeners with normal hearing. In contrast, cochlear implant patients with poor word recognition abilities could not differentiate between stimuli varying in phonotactic probability and lexicality, suggesting that less distinct representations are used by these patients to process spoken words. The implications of these results for outcome assessments and clinical interventions are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 21637721      PMCID: PMC3104273     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Volta Rev        ISSN: 0042-8639


  19 in total

1.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult CLARION cochlear implant users.

Authors:  L Geier; M Barker; L Fisher; J Opie
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1999-04

3.  Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants.

Authors:  S L Mattys; P W Jusczyk; P A Luce; J L Morgan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task.

Authors:  S M Chambers; K I Forster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-09

5.  Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance of upper and lower extremities.

Authors:  K Kauranen; H Vanharanta
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1996-04

6.  Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance.

Authors:  B J Gantz; R S Tyler; J F Knutson; G Woodworth; P Abbas; B F McCabe; J Hinrichs; N Tye-Murray; C Lansing; F Kuk
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Continuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  R D Hollow; R C Dowell; R S Cowan; M C Skok; B C Pyman; G M Clark
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech recognition with the MPEAK and SPEAK speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  L K Holden; M W Skinner; T A Holden
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.591

10.  Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  R C Dowell; D J Mecklenburg; G M Clark
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1986-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

Review 3.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Mary C Luckasen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Using network science in the language sciences and clinic.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Nichol Castro
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.484

7.  Word and Nonword Reading Efficiency in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Kara J Vasil; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni; Aaron C Moberly; Christin Ray
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.

Authors:  Anita E Wagner; Leanne Nagels; Paolo Toffanin; Jane M Opie; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  The Impact of Hearing Experience on Children's Use of Phonological and Semantic Information During Lexical Access.

Authors:  Katherine M Simeon; Tina M Grieco-Calub
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.297

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.