Literature DB >> 3755975

Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants.

R C Dowell, D J Mecklenburg, G M Clark.   

Abstract

We collected data on 40 patients who received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Results were reviewed to determine if the coding strategy is effective in transmitting the intended speech features and to assess patient benefit in terms of communication skills. All patients demonstrated significant improvement over preoperative results with a hearing aid for both lipreading enhancement and speech recognition without lipreading. Of the patients, 50% demonstrated ability to understand connected discourse with auditory input only. For the 23 patients who were tested 12 months postoperatively, there was substantial improvement in open-set speech recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3755975     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1986.03780100042005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  8 in total

Review 1.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Effects of Phonotactic Probabilities on the Processing of Spoken Words and Nonwords by Adults with Cochlear Implants Who Were Postlingually Deafened.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Marcia Hay-McCutcheon; Stacey L Yount
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2000

3.  A speech perturbation strategy based on "Lombard effect" for enhanced intelligibility for cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John H L Hansen; Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Juliana N Saba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes.

Authors:  Srijata Chakravorti; Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Duration of Processor Use Per Day Is Significantly Correlated With Speech Recognition Abilities in Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Nichole C Dwyer; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  The Relationship Between Spectral Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition: Adult Versus Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Stephen M Camarata; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Robert T Dwyer; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.