Literature DB >> 24203880

Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task.

S M Chambers1, K I Forster.   

Abstract

Reaction times in a simultaneous visual matching task were obtained for four types of letter strings: high-frequency words, low-frequency words, orthographically legal nonwords, e.g., CRAWN, and random letter strings. Two findings supported the notion that the matching of word items involves lexical access. First, words were processed faster than legal nonwords, indicating that the analysis of words uses an additional source of information apart from the constraints imposed by orthographic rules. Second, high-frequency words were processed faster than low-frequency words, indicating lexical search. It is proposed that three levels of identification and comparison operate simultaneously in the matching task: at a word level, a letter cluster level, and a letter level. The results of a second experiment give some support to the idea that these levels operate for "different" items as well as "same" items. Whether familiarity effects will be observed for "different" items will depend on the amount of identification and comparison of the two letter strings which is necessary before a difference is detected.

Year:  1975        PMID: 24203880     DOI: 10.3758/BF03197530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  3 in total

1.  "Same"-"different" response times with multi-attribute stimulus differences.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-04

2.  Search time in a redundant visual display.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-03

3.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08
  3 in total
  15 in total

1.  Processing of Kanji and Kana characters within Japanese words.

Authors:  M Shimomura; K Yokosawa
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-07

2.  Letters are functional in word identification.

Authors:  D W Massaro; D Klitzke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-05

3.  The effects of lexical and semantic information on same-different visual comparison of words.

Authors:  R W Barron; L Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-09

4.  Effects of Phonotactic Probabilities on the Processing of Spoken Words and Nonwords by Adults with Cochlear Implants Who Were Postlingually Deafened.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Marcia Hay-McCutcheon; Stacey L Yount
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2000

5.  On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.

Authors:  N F Johnson; P A Allen; T L Strand
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

6.  The plausibility effect: lexical priming or sentential processing?

Authors:  J E Ratcliff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

7.  Part-whole relationships in the processing of small visual patterns.

Authors:  N F Johnson; M Turner-Lyga; B S Pettegrew
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-01

8.  Whole and part comparisons of words and nonwords.

Authors:  H H Marmurek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

9.  Phonological and orthographic factors in the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1981-07

10.  What does the visual system know about words.

Authors:  T H Carr; A Pollatsek; M I Posner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.