Literature DB >> 3172957

Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: audiologic assessment and predictors of performance.

B J Gantz1, R S Tyler, J F Knutson, G Woodworth, P Abbas, B F McCabe, J Hinrichs, N Tye-Murray, C Lansing, F Kuk.   

Abstract

The audiologic performance of 54 postlingually deafened adults wearing cochlear implants was uniformly evaluated. The participants had 9 months' or more experience with one of five different cochlear prostheses (Los Angeles Single Channel (N = 11), Vienna Single Channel (N = 4), Melbourne Multichannel (N = 18), Utah Multichannel (N = 19), San Francisco Multichannel (N = 2). The multichannel designs enabled participants to recognize more environmental sounds, provided more speech reading enhancement, and enabled most users to understand limited speech in the sound-only condition, compared to the single-channel implant group.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3172957     DOI： 10.1288/00005537-198810000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN： 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  18 in total

1.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

2.  Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Role of binaural hearing in speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking using vocoded speech.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of Phonotactic Probabilities on the Processing of Spoken Words and Nonwords by Adults with Cochlear Implants Who Were Postlingually Deafened.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Marcia Hay-McCutcheon; Stacey L Yount
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2000

5.  Cochlear implants in children.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; W H Shapiro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-12

6.  Auditory cortical responses in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Burdo; S Razza; F Di Berardino; G Tognola
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Exploring the Source of Neural Responses of Different Latencies Obtained from Different Recording Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Akinori Kashio; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  K P Gibbin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Colin L W Driscoll; Timothy J Davis; Pam Fiebig; Alan Micco; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Jon K Shallop; Sarah A Sydlowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.