Literature DB >> 21636411

Relative pollination effectiveness of floral visitors of Pitcairnia angustifolia (Bromeliaceae).

José J Fumero-Cabán1, Elvia J Meléndez-Ackerman.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of flower visitors as pollinators will determine their potential role as selective agents on flower traits. Pitcairnia angustifolia has floral characters that would fit pollination by long-billed hummingbirds, and they should be the most effective pollinators for this plant. To test this prediction, we characterized the behavior of visitors toward flowers and their pollination effectiveness. Coereba flaveola (bananaquits) was the most frequent flower visitor and acted as a primary nectar robber; however, they pollinated incidentally and deposited pollen on stigmas. The endemic short-billed hummingbird Chlorostilbon maugaeus behaved as a secondary robber and did not pollinate flowers. As expected, the long-billed hummingbird, Anthracothorax viridis, was the most efficient visitor in terms of pollen deposition; however, it was the least frequent flower visitor. Introduced Apis mellifera (honeybees) were second in efficiency at depositing pollen and performed one third of the flower visits. Estimates of the expected rate of pollen deposition by each pollinator did not identify a single most effective pollinator. For P. angustifolia at least three flower visitors including an exotic bee and a nectar robber may be equally important to reproductive success. While these results limit our ability to make predictions on the role of hummingbird-pollination on current flower evolution, they do suggest the potential for pollination redundancy among flower visitors for P. angustifolia populations.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21636411     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.3.419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  12 in total

1.  Plant-hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialisation gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size.

Authors:  Bo Dalsgaard; Ana M Martín González; Jens M Olesen; Jeff Ollerton; Allan Timmermann; Laila H Andersen; Adrianne G Tossas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Beetle visitations, and associations with quantitative variation of attractants in floral odors of Homalomena propinqua (Araceae).

Authors:  Yuko Kumano-Nomura; Ryohei Yamaoka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Generalist birds outperform specialist sunbirds as pollinators of an African Aloe.

Authors:  Carolina Diller; Miguel Castañeda-Zárate; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Quantity and quality components of effectiveness in insular pollinator assemblages.

Authors:  María C Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Pedro Jordano; Alfredo Valido
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of nectar robbing on male and female reproductive success of a pollinator-dependent plant.

Authors:  Sandra V Rojas-Nossa; José María Sánchez; Luis Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Plant-pollinator interactions and floral convergence in two species of Heliconia from the Caribbean Islands.

Authors:  Silvana Martén-Rodríguez; W John Kress; Ethan J Temeles; Elvia Meléndez-Ackerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Displacement of a native by an alien bumblebee: lower pollinator efficiency overcome by overwhelmingly higher visitation frequency.

Authors:  Josefin A Madjidian; Carolina L Morales; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The ant-pollination system of Cytinus hypocistis (Cytinaceae), a Mediterranean root holoparasite.

Authors:  Clara de Vega; Montserrat Arista; Pedro L Ortiz; Carlos M Herrera; Salvador Talavera
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Novel adaptation to hawkmoth pollinators in Clarkia reduces efficiency, not attraction of diurnal visitors.

Authors:  Timothy J Miller; Robert A Raguso; Kathleen M Kay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Generalization versus specialization in pollination systems: visitors, thieves, and pollinators of Hypoestes aristata (Acanthaceae).

Authors:  Eliška Padyšáková; Michael Bartoš; Robert Tropek; Stěpán Janeček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.