Literature DB >> 21792557

Plant-pollinator interactions and floral convergence in two species of Heliconia from the Caribbean Islands.

Silvana Martén-Rodríguez1, W John Kress, Ethan J Temeles, Elvia Meléndez-Ackerman.   

Abstract

Variation in interspecific interactions across geographic space is a potential driver of diversification and local adaptation. This study quantitatively examined variation in floral phenotypes and pollinator service of Heliconia bihai and H. caribaea across three Antillean islands. The prediction was that floral characters would correspond to the major pollinators of these species on each island. Analysis of floral phenotypes revealed convergence among species and populations of Heliconia from the Greater Antilles. All populations of H. caribaea were similar, characterized by long nectar chambers and short corolla tubes. In contrast, H. bihai populations were strongly divergent: on Dominica, H. bihai had flowers with short nectar chambers and long corollas, whereas on Hispaniola, H. bihai flowers resembled those of H. caribaea with longer nectar chambers and shorter corolla tubes. Morphological variation in floral traits corresponded with geographic differences or similarities in the major pollinators on each island. The Hispaniolan mango, Anthracothorax dominicus, is the principal pollinator of both H. bihai and H. caribaea on Hispaniola; thus, the similarity of floral phenotypes between Heliconia species suggests parallel selective regimes imposed by the principal pollinator. Likewise, divergence between H. bihai populations from Dominica and Hispaniola corresponded with differences in the pollinators visiting this species on the two islands. The study highlights the putative importance of pollinator-mediated selection as driving floral convergence and the evolution of locally-adapted plant variants across a geographic mosaic of pollinator species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21792557     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2043-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird.

Authors:  E J Temeles; I L Pan; J L Brennan; J N Horwitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; W John Kress
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Bruce Anderson; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Origin, adaptive radiation and diversification of the Hawaiian lobeliads (Asterales: Campanulaceae).

Authors:  Thomas J Givnish; Kendra C Millam; Austin R Mast; Thomas B Paterson; Terra J Theim; Andrew L Hipp; Jillian M Henss; James F Smith; Kenneth R Wood; Kenneth J Sytsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae): a role for ecological causation.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; Jill S Miller; Joanna L Rifkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Mate choice and mate competition by a tropical hummingbird at a floral resource.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; W John Kress
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effect of flower shape and size on foraging performance and trade-offs in a tropical hummingbird.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; Carolyn R Koulouris; Sarah E Sander; W John Kress
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  7 in total

1.  Floral adaptation to local pollinator guilds in a terrestrial orchid.

Authors:  Mimi Sun; Karin Gross; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Predominance of self-compatibility in hummingbird-pollinated plants in the Neotropics.

Authors:  Marina Wolowski; Carolina Farias Saad; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Leandro Freitas
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-11-23

3.  Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Rod Peakall; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Do pollinator distributions underlie the evolution of pollination ecotypes in the Cape shrub Erica plukenetii?

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Michael D Pirie; Adam Shuttleworth; Steven D Johnson; Jeremy J Midgley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The design of trapping devices in pollination traps of the genus Arum (Araceae) is related to insect type.

Authors:  David Bröderbauer; Anton Weber; Anita Diaz
Journal:  Bot J Linn Soc       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.911

6.  How Are the Flower Structure and Nectar Composition of the Generalistic Orchid Neottia ovata Adapted to a Wide Range of Pollinators?

Authors:  Emilia Brzosko; Andrzej Bajguz; Magdalena Chmur; Justyna Burzyńska; Edyta Jermakowicz; Paweł Mirski; Piotr Zieliński
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Florivory by the occupants of phytotelmata in flower parts can decrease host plant fecundity.

Authors:  Caio C C Missagia; Maria Alice S Alves
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.624

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.