Literature DB >> 18443825

Displacement of a native by an alien bumblebee: lower pollinator efficiency overcome by overwhelmingly higher visitation frequency.

Josefin A Madjidian1, Carolina L Morales, Henrik G Smith.   

Abstract

Biological invasions might constitute a major threat to mutualisms. Introduced pollinators might competitively displace their native counterparts, which in turn affects the pollination of native plants, if native and alien visitors differ in pollinator effectiveness. Since its invasion in 1994 into south-west Argentina, the introduced European bumblebee Bombus ruderatus has continuously increased in abundance, along with a simultaneous decrease in the abundance of the native Bombus dahlbomii. The latter is the only native bumblebee species of the temperate forests of southern South America, and the main pollinator of the endemic herb Alstroemeria aurea. In order to evaluate the impact of the ongoing displacement of the native by the alien bumblebee, we compared the pollinator effectiveness (i.e., the combination of pollinator efficiency per visit and visitation frequency) between both bumblebee species, as well as related pollinator traits that might account for potential differences in pollinator efficiency. Native Bombus dahlbomii, which has a larger body and spent more time per flower, was the more efficient pollinator compared to Bombus ruderatus, both in terms of quantity and quality of pollen deposited per visit. However, Bombus ruderatus was a much more frequent flower visitor than Bombus dahlbomii. As a consequence, Bombus ruderatus is nowadays a more effective pollinator of A. aurea than its native congener. Despite the lack of evidence of an increase in seed set at the population level, comparisons with historical records of Bombus dahlbomii abundances prior to Bombus ruderatus' invasion suggest that the overall pollination intensity of A. aurea might in fact have risen as a consequence of this invasion. Field experiments like these, that incorporate the natural variation in abundance of native and alien species, are powerful means to demonstrate that the consequences of invasions are more complex than previous manipulated and controlled experiments have suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18443825     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1039-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

Review 1.  Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms.

Authors:  Anna Traveset; David M Richardson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: conjectures and refutations.

Authors:  Diego P Vázquez; Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Sex differential nectar secretion in protandrous Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae): is production altered by pollen removal and receipt?

Authors:  M Aizen; A Basilio
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  The effect of proboscis and corolla tube lengths on patterns and rates of flower visitation by bumblebees.

Authors:  David W Inouye
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen.

Authors:  M P Alexander
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1969-05

7.  Variation in pollinator effectiveness in swamp milkweed, Asclepias incarnata (Apocynaceae).

Authors:  Christopher T Ivey; Pocholo Martinez; Robert Wyatt
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities.

Authors:  C E Christian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genetic rescue of remnant tropical trees by an alien pollinator.

Authors:  C W Dick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Carolina L Morales; Juan M Morales
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  10 in total

1.  Conflict over non-partitioned resources may explain between-species differences in declines: the anthropogenic competition hypothesis.

Authors:  Andrew D Higginson
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Novel adaptation to hawkmoth pollinators in Clarkia reduces efficiency, not attraction of diurnal visitors.

Authors:  Timothy J Miller; Robert A Raguso; Kathleen M Kay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  The Bees among Us: Modelling Occupancy of Solitary Bees.

Authors:  J Scott MacIvor; Laurence Packer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pollination success following loss of a frequent pollinator: the role of compensatory visitation by other effective pollinators.

Authors:  Allysa C Hallett; Randall J Mitchell; Evan R Chamberlain; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Dimorphic flowers modify the visitation order of pollinators from male to female flowers.

Authors:  Kaoru Tsuji; Kazuya Kobayashi; Eisuke Hasegawa; Jin Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  No severe genetic bottleneck in a rapidly range-expanding bumblebee pollinator.

Authors:  Ryan E Brock; Liam P Crowther; David J Wright; David S Richardson; Claire Carvell; Martin I Taylor; Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Functional traits of plants and pollinators explain resource overlap between honeybees and wild pollinators.

Authors:  Andree Cappellari; Giovanna Bonaldi; Maurizio Mei; Dino Paniccia; Pierfilippo Cerretti; Lorenzo Marini
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Behavioural responses by a bumble bee to competition with a niche-constructing congener.

Authors:  Nick M Rosenberger; Marcelo A Aizen; Rachel G Dickson; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Earlier Morning Arrival to Pollen-Rewarding Flowers May Enable Feral Bumble Bees to Successfully Compete with Local Bee Species and Expand Their Distribution Range in a Mediterranean Habitat.

Authors:  Noam Bar-Shai; Uzi Motro; Avishai Shmida; Guy Bloch
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination.

Authors:  Romina Rader; Ignasi Bartomeus; Lucas A Garibaldi; Michael P D Garratt; Brad G Howlett; Rachael Winfree; Saul A Cunningham; Margaret M Mayfield; Anthony D Arthur; Georg K S Andersson; Riccardo Bommarco; Claire Brittain; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Natacha P Chacoff; Martin H Entling; Benjamin Foully; Breno M Freitas; Barbara Gemmill-Herren; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sean R Griffin; Caroline L Gross; Lina Herbertsson; Felix Herzog; Juliana Hipólito; Sue Jaggar; Frank Jauker; Alexandra-Maria Klein; David Kleijn; Smitha Krishnan; Camila Q Lemos; Sandra A M Lindström; Yael Mandelik; Victor M Monteiro; Warrick Nelson; Lovisa Nilsson; David E Pattemore; Natália de O Pereira; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Menno Reemer; Maj Rundlöf; Cory S Sheffield; Jeroen Scheper; Christof Schüepp; Henrik G Smith; Dara A Stanley; Jane C Stout; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Michal Woyciechowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.