Literature DB >> 21635683

Twenty-year prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in patients receiving shock-wave lithotripsy for urolithiasis.

Ben H Chew1, Bogard Zavaglia, Christine Sutton, Robin K Masson, Siu Him Chan, Reza Hamidizadeh, Justin K Lee, Olga Arsovska, Victor A Rowley, Charles Zwirewich, Kourosh Afshar, Ryan F Paterson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients treated with an unmodified HM-3 lithotripter (USWL) and a second-generation modified HM-3 lithotripter (MSWL) 20 years ago at our Centre with that in the provincial population. To determine whether the type of lithotripter was differentially associated with the development of these sequelae. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 727 patients at Vancouver General Hospital who underwent shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) between 1985 and 1989. Our study group was compared with Statistics Canada data describing the provincial prevalence of these diseases. Multivariate analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The response rate was 37.3%. There was a greater proportion of overweight and obese individuals in the study group compared with the provincial average. In univariate analysis, lithotripsy with an unmodified HM-3 (USWL) was associated with a higher rate of DM than the provincial rate, whereas lithotripsy with the modified HM-3 (MSWL) was not. Hypertension was more prevalent in all lithotripsy subjects. On multivariate analysis the type of lithotripter was not associated with the development of either sequela.
CONCLUSIONS: No association between lithotripsy and the development of either DM or hypertension in a multivariate analysis Metabolic syndrome may have elevated the prevalence of DM and hypertension observed in our subjects on univariate analysis, which is in keeping with the fact that our study population had statistically higher body mass indices than the provincial rate. Lithotripsy using the HM-3 was not associated with increased DM or hypertension.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21635683     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

Review 1.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Cui Yu; Liu Longfei; Wang Long; Zeng Feng; Niu Jiping; Li Mao; Qi Lin; Chen Hequn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Shock wave lithotripsy targeting of the kidney and pancreas does not increase the severity of metabolic syndrome in a porcine model.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Cynthia D Johnson; Ziyue Liu; Mouhamad Alloosh; Michael Sturek; Carmella Evans-Molina; Jessica A Mandeville; Ehud Gnessin; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  New-onset diabetes mellitus after shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tuo Deng; Banghua Liao; Ye Tian; Deyi Luo; Jiaming Liu; Tao Jin; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Optimising an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to protect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; James A McAteer; Bret A Connors; Ziyue Liu; James E Lingeman; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Neophytos Petrides; Safiyah Ismail; Faqar Anjum; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

7.  Impact of official technical training for urologists on the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Atsushi Okada; Takahiro Yasui; Kazumi Taguchi; Kazuhiro Niimi; Yasuhiko Hirose; Shuzo Hamamoto; Ryosuke Ando; Yasue Kubota; Yukihiro Umemoto; Keiichi Tozawa; Shoichi Sasaki; Yutaro Hayashi; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Evaluation of long-term side effects after shock-wave lithotripsy for renal calculi using a third generation electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Giacomo Maria Pirola; Salvatore Micali; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Eugenio Martorana; Angelo Territo; Stefano Puliatti; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Effect of renal shock wave lithotripsy on the development of metabolic syndrome in a juvenile swine model: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Ziyue Liu; Bret A Connors; Mouhamad Alloosh; David P Basile; Johnathan D Tune; Michael Sturek; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Recent finding and new technologies in nephrolitiasis: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Marco Rosa; Paolo Usai; Roberto Miano; Fernando J Kim; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Pierluigi Bove; Salvatore Micali
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.