Literature DB >> 21635290

The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition.

James S Magnuson1, James A Dixon, Michael K Tanenhaus, Richard N Aslin.   

Abstract

The sounds that make up spoken words are heard in a series and must be mapped rapidly onto words in memory because their elements, unlike those of visual words, cannot simultaneously exist or persist in time. Although theories agree that the dynamics of spoken word recognition are important, they differ in how they treat the nature of the competitor set-precisely which words are activated as an auditory word form unfolds in real time. This study used eye tracking to measure the impact over time of word frequency and 2 partially overlapping competitor set definitions: onset density and neighborhood density. Time course measures revealed early and continuous effects of frequency (facilitatory) and on set based similarity (inhibitory). Neighborhood density appears to have early facilitatory effects and late inhibitory effects. The late inhibitory effects are due to differences in the temporal distribution of similarity within neighborhoods. The early facilitatory effects are due to subphonemic cues that inform the listener about word length before the entire word is heard. The results support a new conception of lexical competition neighborhoods in which recognition occurs against a background of activated competitors that changes over time based on fine-grained goodness-of-fit and competition dynamics. 2007 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21635290     DOI: 10.1080/03640210709336987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  81 in total

1.  Am I looking at a cat or a dog? Gaze in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia is subject to excessive taxonomic capture.

Authors:  Mustafa Seckin; M-Marsel Mesulam; Joel L Voss; Wei Huang; Emily J Rogalski; Robert S Hurley
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-08-23

3.  Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; Michael K Tanenhaus; Katherine Crosswhite; Mikhail Masharov; Joyce McDonough
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-11

4.  A real-time mechanism underlying lexical deficits in developmental language disorder: Between-word inhibition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Jamie Klein-Packard; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

Review 5.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity.

Authors:  Amy S Desroches; Randy Lynn Newman; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.

Authors:  Anuenue Kukona; Pyeong Whan Cho; James S Magnuson; Whitney Tabor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Phonological Priming With Nonwords in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Patricia J Brooks; Liat Seiger-Gardner; Rita Obeid; Brian MacWhinney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Covert Co-Activation of Bilinguals' Non-Target Language: Phonological Competition from Translations.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Linguist Approaches Biling       Date:  2017-11-06

10.  Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Vicki M Samelson; Sung Hee Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.