Literature DB >> 21632099

Analysis of racial disparities in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer care and outcomes in a tertiary gynecologic oncology referral center.

Robert E Bristow1, Stefanie Ueda, Melissa A Gerardi, Onaopemipo B Ajiboye, Okechukwu A Ibeanu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine disparities in delivery of care and survival according to racial classification among White and African-American women with Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing initial treatment in a tertiary referral center setting.
METHODS: All consecutive patients diagnosed with Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer between 1/1/95 and 12/31/08 were identified and clinic-pathologic variables retrospectively collected. Differences in initial treatment paradigm, surgical and adjuvant therapy, and overall survival according to racial classification were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 405 patients (White, n=366; African-American, n=39) were identified. There were no significant differences according to racial classification in age, CA125, ASA class, histology, tumor grade, the frequency of initial surgery (90.4% vs 82.1%, p=0.06), optimal residual disease (73.0% vs 69.2%, p=0.28), no gross residual disease (51.4% vs 53.8%, p=0.49), and platinum-taxane chemotherapy (88.3% vs 87.2%, p=0.55). The median overall survival for White patients was 50.5 months (95%CI=43.2-57.9 months), compared to 47.0 (95%CI=36.2-57.8) months for African-Americans (p=0.57). On multivariate analysis, age, tumor grade 3, serum albumin <3.0 g/dl, platinum-based chemotherapy, and no gross residual disease were independently associated with overall survival, while African-American race was not (HR=1.06, 95%CI=0.61-1.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing initial treatment for ovarian cancer at a tertiary referral center, African-American patients were as likely as White patients to undergo cytoreductive surgery, be left with minimal post-surgical residual disease, and receive appropriate chemotherapy. With equal access to gynecologic oncology care and multidisciplinary cancer resources, the survival disparities according to race observed in population-based studies are largely mitigated.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632099     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  14 in total

1.  Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry (OCWAA) consortium: a resource of harmonized data from eight epidemiologic studies of African American and white women.

Authors:  Joellen M Schildkraut; Lauren C Peres; Traci N Bethea; Fabian Camacho; Deanna Chyn; Emily K Cloyd; Elisa V Bandera; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Loren Lipworth; Charlotte E Joslin; Faith G Davis; Patricia G Moorman; Evan Myers; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Malcolm C Pike; Anna H Wu; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Racial disparities and patterns of ovarian cancer surgical care in California.

Authors:  F W Liu; L M Randall; K S Tewari; R E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Yvonne Collins; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Dineo Khabele; John H Farley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Distance from a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A proxy for poor cervical cancer outcomes?

Authors:  David A Barrington; Sarah E Dilley; Emily E Landers; Eric D Thomas; Jonathon D Boone; J Michael Straughn; Gerald McGwin; Charles A Leath
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Disparities in ovarian cancer care quality and survival according to race and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Matthew A Powell; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; J Philip Miller; Phillip Y Roland; David G Mutch; William A Cliby
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment in a population-based analysis in Chicago.

Authors:  Charlotte E Joslin; Katherine C Brewer; Faith G Davis; Kent Hoskins; Caryn E Peterson; Heather A Pauls
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Reasons for failure to deliver National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-adherent care in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer at an NCCN cancer center.

Authors:  Britt K Erickson; Jovana Y Martin; Monjri M Shah; J Michael Straughn; Charles A Leath
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Global ovarian cancer health disparities.

Authors:  Ganna Chornokur; Ernest K Amankwah; Joellen M Schildkraut; Catherine M Phelan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Black and Hispanic women are less likely than white women to receive guideline-concordant endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mara Kaspers; Elyse Llamocca; Allison Quick; Jhalak Dholakia; Ritu Salani; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Differences in vitamin D status may account for unexplained disparities in cancer survival rates between African and white Americans.

Authors:  William B Grant; Alan N Peiris
Journal:  Dermatoendocrinol       Date:  2012-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.